首页> 外文期刊>Democratization >The internal dynamics of power-sharing in Africa
【24h】

The internal dynamics of power-sharing in Africa

机译:非洲权力共享的内部动力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Given the increasing use of power-sharing arrangements to manage a wide range of political crises over the past five years it is more important than ever to turn a critical eye on the dynamics and outcomes of unity governments. This paper argues that two key factors shape the way that power-sharing functions in Africa: the distribution of violence (that is, whether any one party has a monopoly on victimhood or whether all parties have committed, and retain the capacity to commit, atrocities) and the level of elite cohesion (whether political leaders have developed norms of mutual accommodation that render it easier to find areas of common-ground). The first half of the paper identifies four main power-sharing dynamics in Africa based on different combinations of the distribution of violence and the level of elite cohesion: the politics of distrust, the politics of collusion, the politics of partisanship and the politics of pacting. The second-half of the paper then draws on evidence from Angola, Burundi, the DRC, Kenya, South Africa and Zimbabwe to illustrate how such variations in the practice of power-sharing shape the prospects for reform.View full textDownload full textKeywordspower-sharing, Africa, democracy, civil war, Angola, Burundi, DRC, Kenya, South Africa, ZimbabweRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.553358
机译:鉴于过去五年来越来越多地使用权力共享安排来处理广泛的政治危机,因此,比以往任何时候都更重要的是,要对统一政府的动态和结果进行批判。本文认为,两个关键因素决定了非洲分享权力的方式:暴力的分布(即,任何一方是否对受害人具有垄断权,还是所有当事方是否已犯下并保留了实施暴行的能力) )和精英人士的凝聚力水平(政治领导人是否制定了相互适应的规范,使人们更容易找到共同立场的领域)。本文的前半部分基于暴力的分布和精英凝聚力水平的不同组合,确定了非洲的四个主要的权力共享动力:不信任政治,合谋政治,党派政治和步伐政治。然后,本文的后半部分借鉴了安哥拉,布隆迪,刚果(金),肯尼亚,南非和津巴布韦的证据,以说明权力分享实践中的这种差异如何塑造改革的前景。查看全文下载全文,非洲,民主,内战,安哥拉,布隆迪,刚果(金),肯尼亚,南非,津巴布韦stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,pubid:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.553358

著录项

  • 来源
    《Democratization》 |2011年第2期|p.336-365|共30页
  • 作者

    Nic Cheeseman;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:06:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号