首页> 外文期刊>Democratization >Democracy, identity and the politics of exclusion in post-genocide Rwanda: the case of the Batwa
【24h】

Democracy, identity and the politics of exclusion in post-genocide Rwanda: the case of the Batwa

机译:种族灭绝后卢旺达的民主,认同与排斥政治:巴特瓦案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Since the 1994 genocide, the Rwandan government has sought to navigate a difficult path between the multi-party democracy favoured by donors and a more tightly managed political environment that it argues is necessary for security. Using the fragile post-genocide political context and a history of political manipulation of ethnic identity as justification, the government has stigmatized and criminalized all references to ethnicity. This paper argues that this strategy has required careful management and manipulation of local narratives of identity and citizenship. It suggests that this has led, for one group in particular - the indigenous Batwa - to a politics of exclusion which limits their ability to participate effectively in post-genocide politics and advocate for their rights. Drawing on interviews with Rwandan civil society activists, government representatives and key bilateral and multilateral donors, the paper explores the often-overlooked impacts of these strategies on the Batwa, Rwanda's smallest ethnic group. Rwanda has been praised for its achievements in creating stability, relative security and a degree of competitive politics in a divided society that is needed to prevent the recurrence of large scale violence. And though the government explains its attempts to manage identity narratives as part of a wider effort to create an inclusive national identity, promoting ‘Rwandan-ness’, it is suggested that the effects of this policy for the Batwa have been negative and exclusionary. Whatever the potential virtues of such a strategy, the paper argues that there is little room for effective representation and accordingly for a political voice for the indigenous Batwa in such a tightly managed system.View full textDownload full textKeywordsRwanda, Batwa, genocide, ideology, identity, exclusionRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.553367
机译:自从1994年种族灭绝以来,卢旺达政府一直试图在捐助者青睐的多党民主制与更加严格管理的政治环境之间走上一条艰难的道路,它认为这对安全是必要的。政府利用种族灭绝后的脆弱政治背景和对族群身份进行政治操纵的历史作为辩解,将所有关于族群的提法都污和定罪。本文认为,这种策略要求对身份和公民身份的本地叙事进行认真的管理和操纵。它表明,这特别是对于一个群体-土著巴特瓦人-导致了一种排斥政治,这限制了他们有效参与种族灭绝后政治并维护其权利的能力。在对卢旺达民间社会活动家,政府代表以及主要的双边和多边捐助者进行采访的基础上,本文探讨了这些战略对卢旺达最小族群巴特瓦人经常被忽视的影响。卢旺达因在分裂社会中创造稳定,相对安全和一定程度的竞争性政治所取得的成就而受到赞扬,这是防止大规模暴力再次发生所必需的。尽管政府解释了其管理身份叙事的尝试,作为建立包容性民族身份,促进“卢旺达性”的更广泛努力的一部分,但有人认为,这项政策对巴特瓦的影响是消极的,而且排他性的无论采用这种策略有何潜在优势,本文都认为,在这样一个严格管理的系统中,土著巴特瓦人几乎没有有效的代表权,也没有相应的政治声音。查看全文下载全文关键字卢旺达,巴特瓦人,种族灭绝,意识形态,身份,排除相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.553367

著录项

  • 来源
    《Democratization》 |2011年第2期|p.490-511|共22页
  • 作者

    Danielle Beswick;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:06:31

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号