首页> 外文期刊>Democratization >Central America, civil society and the ‘pink tide’: democratization or de-democratization?
【24h】

Central America, civil society and the ‘pink tide’: democratization or de-democratization?

机译:中美洲,民间社会与“粉红潮流”:民主化还是民主化?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the literature on the turn to the left in the wider Latin American region, Central America has generally been neglected. The aim of this article is to seek to fill that gap, while specifically assessing the left turn's impact on prospects for democratization in the sub-region. Using three case studies - El Salvador, Honduras and Nicaragua - the article questions the usefulness of transition theory for analysis and instead offers a framework based on state/civil society interaction within the context of globalization. Four key conclusions are made: First, democratization is not a linear process, but can be subject to simultaneous processes of democratization and de-democratization. Second, continued deep structural inequalities remain central to the region's politics but these often provoke unproductive personalistic and partisan politics which can inhibit or curtail democratization. Third, interference from local and/or international economic actors can curtail or reverse democratization measures, underlining the influence of globalization. Fourth, Central America is particularly revelatory of these tendencies due to its acute exposure to extreme oligarchic power and outside influence. It hence can help shed light on wider questions on the blurring of boundaries between state, civil society and market and its impact on democratization, especially within the context of globalization. In this way the article contributes to the analysis of Central America in the current context of the ‘pink tide’, underlines the importance of continued analysis of Central America for democratization studies, and brings new insight to debates on transition theory.View full textDownload full textKeywordsCentral America, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, pink tide, left, democratization, transition theoryRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.619775
机译:在更广泛的拉丁美洲地区向左转的文献中,中美洲通常被忽略。本文的目的是要填补这一空白,同时专门评估左转弯对该分区域民主化前景的影响。本文使用萨尔瓦多,洪都拉斯和尼加拉瓜这三个案例研究,对转型理论对分析的实用性提出了质疑,而是提供了基于全球化背景下国家/公民社会互动的框架。得出四个关键结论:首先,民主化不是一个线性过程,但可以同时进行民主化和去民主化进程。第二,持续的深层次结构性不平等仍然是该地区政治的核心,但是这些不平等常常引发非生产性的个人主义和党派政治,从而抑制或遏制民主化。第三,来自本地和/或国际经济行为者的干预可以减少或逆转民主化措施,从而突出了全球化的影响。第四,中美洲由于敏锐地暴露于极端的寡头权力和外界影响而特别具有启示性。因此,它可以帮助阐明关于国家,公民社会和市场之间的界限模糊及其对民主化的影响的更广泛的问题,特别是在全球化的背景下。这样,本文有助于在“粉红色潮”的当前背景下对中美洲进行分析,强调了继续分析中美洲对民主化研究的重要性,并为过渡理论的辩论带来了新的见解。全文下载关键词中美洲,萨尔瓦多,洪都拉斯,尼加拉瓜,粉红潮,左派,民主化,过渡理论相关var addthis_config = { facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.619775

著录项

  • 来源
    《Democratization》 |2012年第6期|p.1039-1064|共26页
  • 作者

    Barry Cannona* Mo Humeb;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:06:36

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号