首页> 外文期刊>Democratization >Participatory democracy meets the hard rock of energy policy: South Africa's National Integrated Resource Plan
【24h】

Participatory democracy meets the hard rock of energy policy: South Africa's National Integrated Resource Plan

机译:参与式民主遇到能源政策的硬石:南非的国家综合资源计划

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

South Africa faces a demanding period of policymaking in search of sustainable energy solutions, which are required if the country is to reduce future increase in its greenhouse gas emissions. The most recent platform for this process was the drafting of the Integrated Resource Plan 2 (IRP 2). The Constitutional provisions that require participation in law-making have been strengthened, placing an onus on government to facilitate public involvement. This article examines the extent to which constitutional and statutory duty to permit meaningful public participation was met in developing the IRP2. In South Africa there are many obstacles to effective engagement, attenuated by the complexities of the political context, social inequities, and imperatives of economic growth. The case demonstrates that where civil society organizations develop strategic and technical capacity, they can begin to overcome these obstacles and compete with incumbent corporate stakeholders whose vested interest lies in monopolizing more secretive and exclusionary decision processes, where government departments struggle to address the scale, urgency and inter-connected complexity of sustainable development. But the IRP 2 case study is also a cautionary tale that demonstrates the limits of what can be achieved through constructive dialogue if stakeholders have uneven access to decision-making processes and uneven capacity to have influence, especially in processes where a premium is placed on technical expertise and where that expert knowledge may be used to manipulate outcomes.View full textDownload full textKeywordspublic participation, energy policy, South Africa, integrated resource planning, electricityRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.709688
机译:南非面临寻求可持续能源解决方案的决策期,这是该国要减少未来温室气体排放量增加所必需的。该过程的最新平台是《综合资源计划2》(IRP 2)的起草。要求参与立法的宪法条款得到了加强,为政府提供了责任以促进公众参与。本文研究了在制定IRP2时,在何种程度上满足了宪法和法定义务以允许有意义的公众参与。在南非,由于政治环境的复杂性,社会不平等以及经济增长的紧迫性,削弱了有效参与的许多障碍。该案例表明,在民间社会组织发展战略和技术能力的地方,他们可以开始克服这些障碍并与现有的公司利益相关者竞争,这些利益相关者的既得利益在于垄断更秘密和排他性的决策流程,而政府部门则在努力解决规模和紧迫性。以及可持续发展相互关联的复杂性。但是,IRP 2案例研究也是一个警示性的故事,它说明了如果利益相关者在决策过程中使用权不均且影响力不均的情况下,通过建设性对话所能取得的成就的局限性,特别是在对技术溢价给予重视的过程中专业知识以及可以用来操纵结果的专业知识。查看全文下载全文关键字公众参与,能源政策,南非,综合资源规划,电力,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.709688

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号