首页> 外文期刊>Democratization >Coerced transitions in Timor-Leste and Kosovo: managing competing objectives of institution-building and local empowerment
【24h】

Coerced transitions in Timor-Leste and Kosovo: managing competing objectives of institution-building and local empowerment

机译:东帝汶和科索沃的强制过渡:管理体制建设和地方赋权的竞争目标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Institution-building under the aegis of international administration has faced various hurdles and obstacles in Kosovo and Timor-Leste. One particular hurdle is related to the mandates of the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo and United Nations Transitional Administration in East Timor, which created a conflict of objectives for the external actors - specifically, between institution-building and local empowerment. This article analyses the strategies of international administrators and local elites in this context. After attempting to prioritize institution-building while paying lip-service to imperatives of empowerment, international officials were forced to readjust their strategy as a result of opposition and resistance from local partners. In light of the practical consequences of the conflict of objectives, international officials proceeded to prioritize local empowerment, reducing their institution-building role. The article concludes by identifying the implications of these experiences for the debate concerning democracy promotion, and highlights the attributes of the ‘participatory intervention’ framework put forward by Chopra and Hohe.View full textDownload full textKeywordsTimor-Leste, Kosovo, international administration, intervention, state-building, democracy promotion, institution-building, empowerment, institutionalization before liberalization strategy, IBLRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.674358
机译:在国际行政管理下的体制建设在科索沃和东帝汶面临各种障碍和障碍。一个特别的障碍与联合国科索沃临时行政当局特派团和联合国东帝汶过渡行政当局的任务有关,这给外部行为者造成了目标冲突,特别是在机构建设和地方授权之间。本文分析了在这种情况下的国际管理员和本地精英的策略。试图在优先考虑体制建设的同时,对授权的要求进行口口相传之后,由于当地合作伙伴的反对和抵制,国际官员被迫重新调整其战略。鉴于目标冲突的实际后果,国际官员着手优先考虑地方赋权,从而减少了其在机构建设中的作用。本文最后通过确定这些经验对促进民主的辩论的意义进行了总结,并着重介绍了乔普拉和霍赫提出的“参与性干预”框架的属性。查看全文下载全文关键字东帝汶,科索沃,国际行政,干预,国家建设,民主建设,体制建设,赋权,自由化之前的制度化策略,IBLRelated var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin, facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.674358

著录项

  • 来源
    《Democratization》 |2012年第3期|p.465-485|共21页
  • 作者

    Nicolas Lemay-Héberta*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:06:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号