首页> 外文期刊>Democratization >Oil in the family: managing presidential succession in Azerbaijan
【24h】

Oil in the family: managing presidential succession in Azerbaijan

机译:家庭中的石油:管理阿塞拜疆的总统继任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article argues that Azerbaijan did not display a backlash against the ‘colour revolutions’ in the post-Soviet space because the primary threat to the regime came from within, and not from below. Thanks to the overlap of power and property in Azerbaijan, the ruling elite's revenues from oil resources, and the failure of international actors to support the opposition, civil society did not pose a major challenge to the regime's dominance during the ‘revolutionary’ period in the mid-2000s. However, there was a risk that the regime could fragment due to factional in-fighting. President Heydar Aliyev had laboured to consolidate power throughout the 1990s after years of turmoil, and, although Azerbaijan was stable by 2003, his passing did not guarantee a smooth transition. Instead, his successor - his son, Ilham - had to carefully manage rival factions to maintain the political status quo. The article argues that scholars of post-Soviet politics, though usually drawn to formal political opposition as a source of potential change, should also pay attention to the divisions among those in power, and not take a unitary state for granted.View full textDownload full textKeywordsAzerbaijan, colour revolutions, AliyevRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.641300
机译:本文认为,阿塞拜疆并未对后苏联时期的“颜色革命”表现出强烈反对,因为对该政权的主要威胁来自内部,而不是来自内部。由于阿塞拜疆权力和财产的重叠,统治精英从石油资源获得的收入以及国际参与者未能支持反对派,在“革命”时期,民间社会并未对该政权的统治构成重大挑战。在2000年代中期。但是,由于派系内斗,该政权可能会分裂。在经历了多年动荡之后,盖达尔·阿里耶夫(Heydar Aliyev)总统在整个1990年代一直在努力巩固权力,尽管阿塞拜疆到2003年稳定下来,但他的去世并不能保证顺利过渡。相反,他的继任者-他的儿子伊拉姆(Ilham)-必须谨慎管理敌对派系,以维持政治现状。这篇文章认为,后苏联政治学者虽然通常被形式上的政治反对派吸引为潜在变革的源头,但他们也应注意当权者之间的分歧,而不是将单一制国家视为理所当然。 textKeywords阿塞拜疆,颜色革命,Aliyev 4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.641300

著录项

  • 来源
    《Democratization》 |2012年第1期|p.60-77|共18页
  • 作者

    Scott Radnitza*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:06:34

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号