首页> 外文期刊>Defense & Security Analysis >Safeguards Against Nuclear Terrorism: HEU vs Plutonium
【24h】

Safeguards Against Nuclear Terrorism: HEU vs Plutonium

机译:防范核恐怖主义:高浓铀与P

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

importance of which our calculations show formally and explicitly through the prominence of the quantities dp_u/dc_u and dp_p/dc_p in concluding results. What has already been spent is important only in that prior efforts have brought us to a status quo, hopefully with a few lessons learned. The absence of the absolute cost of safeguards and stockpile elimination from our criteria for optimal operation, however, renders clear that as future strategies go, threat reduction per dollar is the relevant quantity, whereas for example a weighing of accumulated cost of safeguards versus estimated cost of an attack is not. Roughly speaking, as long as one dollar invested in a safeguards branch lowers the nuclear terrorism threat by more than one dollar equivalent, safeguards spending should be increased for that branch.
机译:在结论结果中,通过突出dp_u / dc_u和dp_p / dc_p的数量,我们的计算形式和显式显示了它们的重要性。已经花费的东西很重要,因为先前的努力已经使我们进入了现状,并希望能从中学到一些教训。但是,我们的最佳运行标准缺乏保障的绝对成本和消除库存的能力,这清楚地表明,随着未来战略的发展,每美元的威胁减少是相关的数量,例如,权衡保障的累计成本与估计成本攻击不是。粗略地说,只要在保障监督部门投入一美元,就能将核恐怖主义威胁降低一美元以上,那么该部门的保障支出就应该增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号