...
首页> 外文期刊>Defence Studies >Effective in battle: conceptualizing soldiers'combat effectiveness
【24h】

Effective in battle: conceptualizing soldiers'combat effectiveness

机译:在战斗中有效:概念化士兵的作战效能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

How do we understand combat effectiveness - soldiers'performance in battle? Despite the broad consensus that understanding combat effectiveness is important both for scholars and policymakers, there is widespread disagreement about what combat effectiveness is. More specifically, studies of effectiveness tend to focus on either the skill of soldiers in battle, or their will to fight. Yet both skill and will are essential components of an effective fighting force. This article argues that understanding combat effectiveness requires understanding both of these key components of effectiveness. In other words, combat effectiveness requires both the skill and will to engage the enemy in an organized manner. It then demonstrates the usefulness of this conceptualization by applying it to the cases of British, Indian, and Australian forces fighting the Japanese during the Second World War. Only when scholars are talking about the same concept will our understanding of the conditions under which militaries are effective in battle progress. By comparing different units fighting the same opponent under the same material conditions, I demonstrate that units vary both in their combat skill and their will to fight, and that understanding their effectiveness in battle requires analyzing both of these key factors.
机译:我们如何理解战斗力-士兵在战斗中的表现?尽管达成广泛共识,即了解战斗力对学者和政策制定者都很重要,但对于什么是战斗力却存在广泛的分歧。更具体地说,有效性研究倾向于集中于士兵的战斗技能或战斗意愿。然而技巧和意志都是有效战斗力的基本组成部分。本文认为,了解作战效能需要了解效能的这两个关键组成部分。换句话说,战斗力既需要技巧,也需要以有组织的方式与敌人交战。然后,通过将其应用于第二次世界大战期间与日本人作战的英国,印度和澳大利亚军队的案例,证明了这种概念化的有用性。只有当学者们谈论同一概念时,我们才能理解军队在战斗中有效发挥作用的条件。通过比较在相同物质条件下与同一对手作战的不同部队,我证明了部队的战斗技能和战斗意愿各不相同,并且了解其在战斗中的效能需要分析这两个关键因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号