首页> 外文期刊>Deep-Sea Research >Differences in recovery between deep-sea hydrothermal vent and vent-proximate communities after a volcanic eruption
【24h】

Differences in recovery between deep-sea hydrothermal vent and vent-proximate communities after a volcanic eruption

机译:火山喷发后深海热液喷口与喷口附近群落恢复的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Deep-sea hydrothermal vents and the surrounding basalt seafloor are subject to major natural disturbance events such as volcanic eruptions. In the near future, anthropogenic disturbance in the form of deep-sea mining could also significantly affect the faunal communities of hydrothermal vents. In this study, we monitor and compare the recovery of insular, highly productive vent communities and vent-proximate basalt communities following a volcanic eruption that destroyed almost all existing communities at the East Pacific Rise, 9 degrees 50'N in 2006. To study the recovery patterns of the benthic communities, we placed settlement substrates at vent sites and their proximate basalt areas and measured the prokaryotic abundance and compared the meio- and macrofaunal species richness and composition at one, two and four years after the eruption. In addition, we collected samples from the overlying water column with a pelagic pump, at one and two years after the volcanic eruption, to determine the abundance of potential meiofauna colonisers. One year after eruption, mean meio- and macrofaunal abundances were not significantly different from pre-eruption values in vent habitats (meio: 8-1838 ind. 64 cm(-2) in 2006; 3-6246 ind. 64 cm(-2) in 2001/02; macro: 95-1600 ind. 64 cm(-2) in 2006; 205-4577 ind. 64 cm(-2) in 2001/02) and on non-vent basalt habitats (meio: 10-1922 ind. 64 cm(-2) in 2006; 8328 ind. 64 cm(-2) in 2003/04; macro: 14-3351 ind. 64 cm(-2) in 2006; 2-63 ind. 64 cm(-2) in 2003/04), but species recovery patterns differed between the two habitat types. In the vent habitat, the initial community recovery was relatively quick but incomplete four years after eruption, which may be due to the good dispersal capabilities of vent endemic macrofauna and vent endemic dirivultid copepods. At vents, 42% of the pre-eruption meio- and 39% of macrofaunal species had returned. In addition, some new species not evident prior to the eruption were found. At the tubeworm site Tica, a total of 26 meio- and 19 macrofaunal species were found in 2009, which contrasts with the 24 meio- and 29 macrofauna species detected at the site in 2001/01 In the basalt habitat, community recovery of meiofauna was slower with only 28% of the original 64 species present four years after eruption. The more limited dispersal capabilities of meiofauna basalt specialists such as nematodes or harpacticoid copepods probably caused this pattern. In contrast, 67% of the original 27 macrofaunal species had recolonized the basalt by 2009. Our results suggest that not only vent communities, but also species-rich communities of vent-proximate habitats require attention in conservation efforts. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:深海热液喷口和周围的玄武岩海底易受重大自然干扰事件的影响,例如火山喷发。在不久的将来,深海采矿形式的人为干扰也可能极大地影响热液喷口的动物群落。在这项研究中,我们监测并比较了2006年9月50日东太平洋上升(East Pacific Rise)摧毁了几乎所有现有群落的火山喷发后岛状,高产通气群落和近临玄武岩群落的恢复情况。在底栖生物群落的恢复模式中,我们在喷发后一,两年和四年内将沉积物放置在通风点及其邻近的玄武岩区域,并测量了原核生物的丰度,并比较了近,大型动物的丰富度和组成。此外,我们在火山爆发后的第一年和第二年用上层水泵从上层水柱中收集了样本,以确定潜在的meiofauna定居者的数量。喷发后一年,平均和大型动物体的丰度与喷发前栖息地喷发前的值没有显着差异(2006年,喷发:8-1838 ind。64 cm(-2); 3-6246 ind。64 cm(-2) )在2001/02年;宏观:在2006年95-1600 ind。64 cm(-2);在2001/02年在205-4577 ind。64 cm(-2)和非通风的玄武岩生境(meio:10- 2006年为1922英寸64厘米(-2); 2003/04年为8328英寸64厘米(-2);宏:2006年为14-3351英寸64厘米(-2); 2-63英寸64厘米(-2) -2)在2003/04年),但两种生境类型的物种恢复模式有所不同。在喷口栖息地,喷发后的四年内,社区的初始恢复相对较快,但还不完全,这可能是由于喷口地方大型动物和喷口地方双栖co足类动物的良好扩散能力所致。在喷口处,喷发前的42%和大型动物的39%已经返回。另外,发现了一些在喷发前不明显的新物种。 2009年,在the虫提卡地区共发现26种近缘动物和19种大型动物,这与2001/01年在该地点发现的24种近缘动物和29种大型动物形成了鲜明的对比。喷发四年后,最初的64种中只有28%变慢。象线虫或类立足类足足类动物的食盐类玄武岩专家的扩散能力受到限制,可能是造成这种现象的原因。相比之下,到2009年,最初的27种大型动物物种中有67%已将玄武岩重新定殖。我们的结果表明,不仅在通风方面,而且在临近通风地的生境中物种丰富的社区都需要在保护工作中给予关注。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Deep-Sea Research》 |2015年第12期|167-182|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Vienna, Dept Marine Biol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria|German Ctr Marine Biodivers Res DZMB, Senckenberg Meer, D-26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany|Royal Netherlands Inst Sea Res NIOZ, Ecosyst Studies, NL-4401 NT Yerseke, Netherlands;

    Rhode Isl Coll, Dept Biol, Providence, RI 02908 USA;

    German Ctr Marine Biodivers Res DZMB, Senckenberg Meer, D-26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany;

    Woods Hole Oceanog Inst, Dept Biol, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA;

    CNRS UPMC UMR8222, LECOB Observ Oceanol, F-66650 Banyuls Sur Mer, France;

    Univ Paris 06, Univ Paris 04, UMR 7093, LOV,Observ Oceanog, F-06230 Villefranche Sur Mer, France|CNRS, UMR 7093, LOV, Observ Oceanog, F-06230 Villefranche Sur Mer, France;

    Woods Hole Oceanog Inst, Dept Biol, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA;

    Univ Vienna, Dept Marine Biol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Hydrothermal vent; Volcanic eruption; Disturbance; Recovery; Fauna; Deep-sea mining;

    机译:热液喷口;火山喷发;扰动;恢复;动物群;深海采矿;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号