首页> 外文期刊>Decision support systems >Telework vs. central work: A comparative view of knowledge accessibility
【24h】

Telework vs. central work: A comparative view of knowledge accessibility

机译:远程办公与中心工作:知识可及性的比较视图

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

With increasing popularity of telework arrangements especially among knowledge workers, effective knowledge access in the virtual setup is becoming vital to their performance. Despite the imperative, there has been a lack of theoretical and empirical efforts to investigate knowledge accessibility by distributed workers. Our study examines the gap between telework and central work in accessing knowledge with varying levels of tacitness (or implicitness), and in the use of communication media for knowledge exchange. Media theories offered a conceptual foundation for deriving relevant hypotheses. Necessary data were gathered from teleworkers working at companies with a large telework program in Japan. Both survey questionnaire and interviews were mobilized for balanced information gathering. Data analysis shows that, although information richness perception of a medium is largely rational, it is also partially re-structured by non-rationality factors. It also revealed significant discrepancies between telework and central-work in knowledge accessibility and in the patterns of media usage for knowledge access. Implications of the findings are discussed in terms of telework design and telework productivity.
机译:随着远程工作安排的日益普及,尤其是在知识工作者中,虚拟设置中有效的知识访问对其性能至关重要。尽管有必要,但仍缺乏理论和经验的方法来调查分布式工作者的知识可及性。我们的研究考察了远程工作和中心工作之间在获取具有不同默认级别(或默认级别)的知识以及使用通信媒体进行知识交换方面的差距。媒体理论为推导相关假设提供了概念基础。从在日本拥有大型远程办公计划的公司工作的远程办公人员收集了必要的数据。动员了调查问卷和访谈以收集平衡的信息。数据分析表明,尽管对媒体的信息丰富度感知在很大程度上是合理的,但它也被非理性因素部分重组。它还揭示了远程工作和中央工作之间在知识可访问性和用于知识访问的媒体使用方式上的重大差异。在远程办公设计和远程办公生产率方面讨论了这些发现的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号