首页> 外文期刊>Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry >Role of ADME Characteristics in Drug Discovery and Their In Silico Evaluation: In Silico Screening of Chemicals for their Metabolic Stability
【24h】

Role of ADME Characteristics in Drug Discovery and Their In Silico Evaluation: In Silico Screening of Chemicals for their Metabolic Stability

机译:ADME特性在药物发现中的作用及其计算机评价:对其化学物质的代谢稳定性进行计算机筛选

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Drug discovery is a long, arduous process broadly grouped into disease target identification, target validation, high-throughput identification of “hits” and “leads”, lead optimization, and pre-clinical and clinical evaluation. Each area is a vast discipline in itself. However, all but the first two stages involve, to varying degrees, the characterization of absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, (ADME), and toxicity (T) of the molecules being pursued as potential drug candidates. Clinical failures of about 50% of the Investigational New Drug (IND) filings are attributed to their inadequate ADMET attributes. It is, therefore, no surprise that, in the current climate of social and regulatory pressure on healthcare costs, the pharmaceutical industry is searching for any means to minimize this attrition. Building mathematical models, called in silico screens, to reliably predict ADMET attributes solely from molecular structure is at the heart of this effort in reducing costs as well as development cycle times. This article reviews the emerging field of in silico evaluation of ADME characteristics. For different approaches that have been employed in this area, a critique of the scope and limitations of their descriptors, statistical methods, and reliability are presented. For instance, are geometry-based descriptors absolutely essential or is lower-level structure quantification equally good? What advantages, if any, do we have for methods like artificial neural networks over the least squares optimization methods with rigorous statistical diagnostics? Is any in silico screen worth application, let alone interpretation, if it is not adequately validated? Once deemed acceptable, what good is an in silico screen if it cannot be made available at the workbench of drug discovery teams distributed across the globe throughout multi-national pharmaceutical companies? These are not mere discussion points, rather this article embarks on the stepwise mechanics of developing a successful in silico screen. The process is exemplified by our efforts in developing one such screen for predicting metabolic stability of chemicals in a human S9 liver homogenate assay. A real-life use of this in silico screen in a variety of discovery projects at GlaxoSmithKline is presented, highlighting successes and limitations of such applications. Finally, we project some capabilities of in silico ADME tools for greater impact and contribution to successful, efficient drug discovery.
机译:药物发现是一个漫长而艰巨的过程,大致可分为疾病目标识别,目标确认,“命中”和“潜在顾客”的高通量鉴定,潜在顾客优化以及临床前和临床评估。每个领域本身都是一门广阔的学科。但是,除了前两个阶段外,所有其他阶段都在不同程度上涉及被视为潜在候选药物的分子的吸收,分布,代谢,排泄(ADME)和毒性(T)的表征。约有50%的研究用新药(IND)档案的临床失败归因于其ADMET属性不足。因此,不足为奇的是,在当前社会和法规对医疗保健成本施加压力的情况下,制药行业正在寻找任何方法来尽量减少这种消耗。建立数学模型(称为计算机屏幕)以仅从分子结构可靠地预测ADMET属性是降低成本和缩短开发周期的努力的核心。本文回顾了ADME特性的计算机评估新兴领域。对于此领域已采用的不同方法,提出了对其描述符,统计方法和可靠性的范围和局限性的批评。例如,基于几何的描述符绝对必要吗?还是较低级别的结构量化同样好?与具有严格统计诊断功能的最小二乘法优化方法相比,人工神经网络等方法有什么优势?如果没有充分验证,任何计算机屏幕都值得应用,更不用说解释了吗?一旦被认为可以接受,如果无法在遍布全球的跨国制药公司的药物发现团队的工作台上使用计算机模拟筛选,那有什么好处?这些不只是讨论要点,而是本文着重介绍了开发成功的计算机屏幕的逐步机制。通过我们的努力,我们开发出了一种用于预测人类S9肝匀浆测定法中化学物质代谢稳定性的筛选方法,从而证明了这一过程。葛兰素史克在各种发现项目中对这种计算机屏幕的真实用法进行了介绍,突出了此类应用的成功与局限。最后,我们计划使用in silico ADME工具的一些功能,以对成功,高效的药物发现产生更大的影响和贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号