Highlights<'/> When less is more: innovations for tracking progress toward global targets
首页> 外文期刊>Current opinion in environmental sustainability >When less is more: innovations for tracking progress toward global targets
【24h】

When less is more: innovations for tracking progress toward global targets

机译:少即是多:追踪全球目标进度的创新

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

HighlightsSuccess of global agreements depends on the ability to monitor progress toward goals.Prescribed approaches largely follow a more is better philosophy.Less burdensome and coherent, standardized and decision-relevant systems are needed.Innovations that lower the cost of monitoring change at scale are rapidly emerging.Accountability and adaptive management of recent global agreements such as the Sustainable Development Goals and Paris Climate Agreement, will in part rely on the ability to track progress toward the social and environmental targets they set. Current metrics and monitoring systems, however, are not yet up to the task. We argue that there is an imperative to consider principles of coherence (what to measure), standardization (how to measure) and decision-relevance (why to measure) when designing monitoring schemes if they are to be practical and useful. New approaches that have the potential to match the necessary scale of monitoring, with sufficient accuracy and at reasonable cost, are emerging; although, they represent a significant departure from the historical norm in some cases. Iterative review and adaptation of analytical approaches and available technology will certainly be needed to continuously design ways to best track our progress.
机译: 突出显示 全球协议的成功取决于监视实现目标进度的能力。 规定的方法很大程度上遵循了更好的原则。 < / ce:list-item> 减轻负担和连贯性,则需要标准化和决策相关的系统。 可降低移动办公成本的创新大规模的监控变化正在迅速出现。 最近的问责制和自适应管理诸如可持续发展目标和《巴黎气候协定》之类的全球协议将部分依赖于追踪实现其设定的社会和环境目标的进展的能力。但是,当前的指标和监视系统尚未完成任务。我们认为,在设计监测方案时,如果要切实可行,就必须考虑连贯性(衡量标准),标准化(如何衡量)和决策相关性(为什么要衡量)的原则。正在出现有可能以足够的准确性和合理的成本与必要的监测规模相匹配的新方法;但是,在某些情况下,它们与历史规范存在重大差异。不断需要对设计方法和可用技术进行反复审查和调整,以不断设计出最好的方法来跟踪我们的进度。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF),CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security Nairobi;

    World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF);

    World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF),London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine;

    World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF);

    London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine,Leverhulme Centre for Integrative Research on Agriculture and Health;

    World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF),Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn;

    World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF);

    University of Cape Town;

    CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security Nairobi,International Livestock Research Institute;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号