首页> 外文期刊>Cultural Trends >Museum collections and sustainability
【24h】

Museum collections and sustainability

机译:博物馆收藏与可持续发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This contribution to the debate on museum collecting and disposal takes as its starting point the results of a survey which demonstrates that museums are continuing to collect at a significant rate, and that disposal is not being used as a collections management tool. Museums are therefore currently unsustainable institutions, which pass on their expanded collections in a way that increases the management burden for future generations. In order to address this problem, it is argued that disposal must have a significant role to play in collections management. It is still rarely used because a professional reticence over the issue has developed, both through decades of training which has instilled a “presumption against disposal”, and because nearly all disposals have been done on pragmatic grounds of saving costs or space, with no coherent intellectual framework within which to justify them. What is needed is a review of the philosophy underpinning museum collecting and an examination of whether it still serves us well. The literature on cultural heritage and the anthropology of memory provides a framework for challenging the notion that museums still function as repositories of objects and specimens that represent an objective record or collective memory. Instead, they should be seen for what they are: partial, historically contingent assemblages that reflect the tastes and interests of both the times and the individuals who made them. The intellectual framework put forward allows us not to be solely beholden by the collecting decisions of our predecessors, but to re-work these object “memories” and to choose to “forget” some of them through disposal. Finally, some of the practical implications of this framework are examined. It does not mean that museums can dispose of anything they choose, but it does mean that, instead of treating all collections as having equal importance, the ascription of value must become a fundamental part of curatorship. A number of existing schemes that do this are summarized, and some prospects for future development are outlined.
机译:对博物馆收藏和处置的辩论的这种贡献以一项调查的结果作为起点,该调查表明博物馆正在继续以很高的比率进行收藏,并且处置没有被用作收藏品管理工具。因此,博物馆目前是不可持续的机构,以扩大后代的管理负担来传递其扩大的收藏。为了解决这个问题,有人认为处置必须在馆藏管理中发挥重要作用。它之所以很少使用,是因为经过数十年的培训,他们逐渐形成了对这个问题的专业态度,这已经灌输了“反对处置的推定”,并且因为几乎所有的处置都是出于节省成本或节省空间的务实理由,而且没有连贯性证明其合理性的知识框架。需要的是对博物馆收藏的哲学基础进行审查,并检查它是否仍然对我们有好处。关于文化遗产和记忆人类学的文献为质疑博物馆仍然充当代表客观记录或集体记忆的物体和标本的库这一观念提供了一个框架。取而代之的是,应该从本质上看待它们:反映历史和创造时代的个人的品味和兴趣的,历史上偶然的部分组合。提出的知识框架使我们不仅可以被前辈的收集决定所吸引,还可以重新处理这些对象的“记忆”,并选择通过处置“忘却”其中的一些。最后,研究了该框架的一些实际含义。这并不意味着博物馆可以处置他们选择的任何物品,而是意味着对价值的分配必须成为策展工作的基本组成部分,而不是将所有收藏视为同等重要。总结了许多现有的方案,并概述了未来的发展前景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号