首页> 外文期刊>Critique >Reading Negri
【24h】

Reading Negri

机译:读内格里

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This review article sets out to explore three main themes that emerged through reading Murphy and Mustapha's edited two-volume collection of essays on the thought of Antonio Negri. These themes are 'the refusal of work'; questions of socialist organization, and finally the debate pertaining to the emergence of new forms of labour—specifically 'immaterial labour' in contemporary capitalist societies. In relation to the first, I conclude that—despite the claims of a number of contributors—such a notion of 'refusal' prioritizes a rather trivial form of resistance over a more concrete strategically grounded mode of socialist struggle. Moreover, I maintain it is mistaken to believe that work in itself ought to be refused; rather socialists should focus their sights on resisting alienating (bad) work; that is, primarily work located in exploitative labour processes of which contemporary capitalism is the most significant. In relation to the second, the paper takes as its key focus Negri's strategic engagement with Leninism, specifically as this concerns revolutionary subjectivity and organizational questions. Here I challenge Negri's (pragmatic) reading of Lenin specifically, and more generally Leninism as an approach to the issue of socialist organisation. In relation to the third theme, I utilise a range of the contributing chapters to explore Negri's (and indeed Hardt's) arguments on immaterial labour and bio-politics. Against Negri's tendency to overstate the immateriality of labour, I emphasize both the relationship of complex interdependency of all forms of labour 'material' and 'non-material', in contemporary global capitalist society, and the continuing physicality of processes of exploitation.
机译:这篇评论文章着手探讨通过阅读墨菲和穆斯塔法关于安东尼奥·内格里(Antonio Negri)思想的两卷集论文集而出现的三个主要主题。这些主题是“拒绝工作”;关于社会主义组织的问题,最后是与新型劳动形式(特别是当代资本主义社会中的“非物质劳动”)的出现有关的辩论。关于第一个问题,我得出的结论是,尽管有许多贡献者主张,但这种“拒绝”的概念优先考虑了一种相对琐碎的抵抗形式,而不是一种更为具体的,以战略为基础的社会主义斗争方式。而且,我坚持认为应该拒绝工作本身是错误的。相反,社会主义者应该把目光集中在抵抗疏远的(糟糕的)工作上。也就是说,主要工作是在剥削性的劳动过程中进行的,而当代资本主义是最重要的。关于第二个方面,本文将尼格里与列宁主义的战略接触作为重点,特别是因为这涉及革命性的主观性和组织性问题。在这里,我特别质疑内格里对列宁的(务实的)解读,更广泛地挑战列宁主义作为解决社会主义组织问题的一种方法。关于第三个主题,我利用一系列贡献性的章节来探讨内格里(乃至哈特)关于非物质劳动和生物政治的观点。反对涅格里(Negri)夸大劳动非物质性的倾向,我强调当代全球资本主义社会中各种形式的劳动“物质”和“非物质”的复杂相互依存的关系,以及剥削过程的持续物理性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号