首页> 外文期刊>Critical Studies on Terrorism >Sic[k] of the ‘new terrorism’ debate? A response to our critics
【24h】

Sic[k] of the ‘new terrorism’ debate? A response to our critics

机译:“新恐怖主义”辩论的Sic [k]?对我们批评家的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Apart from the great debates on the definition of terrorism or its causes, the discussion about whether ‘new terrorism’ can really be considered new or not has become one of the central disagreements in terrorism research. This article will respond to the criticism voiced by some of the proponents of the ‘new terrorism’ idea and reflect on the merits of their arguments. It will emphasis the importance of words and the implication of small predicates such as ‘new’ for the construction of terrorism and our reaction to it.View full textDownload full textKeywordsnew terrorism, criticism, words, debate, waves, metaphorsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2011.623428
机译:除了关于恐怖主义的定义或其原因的辩论之外,关于“新恐怖主义”是否真的可以被认为是新的讨论已经成为恐怖主义研究中的主要分歧之一。本文将回应“新恐怖主义”主张的一些支持者提出的批评,并反思其论点的优劣。它将强调单词的重要性以及诸如“ new”之类的小谓词对恐怖主义的构造及其对我们的反应的含义。查看全文下载全文关键字新恐怖主义,批评,单词,辩论,波动,隐喻相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2011.623428

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号