首页> 外文期刊>Critical Studies on Security >The religious turn reconsidered
【24h】

The religious turn reconsidered

机译:重新考虑宗教转折

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It may be the case that even 10 years ago the question posed in this collection would have been a very surprising - perhaps even a heretical - question to ask in the study of International Relations (IR; heretical in the sense of challenging the secular self-understanding of the discipline). It is still probably a surprise for many scholars to hear the idea that there has been a 'religious renaissance' or 'religious turn' in the study of IR. This collection grapples with the idea that previously stable concepts, categories, or distinctions, which almost appear to those of us in Europe or the West as natural concepts or distinctions - what constitutes the religious, the sacred, and the secular - and what constitutes the political or even the economic, have been de-centred - and, perhaps, even destabilized, by the impact on theory, and theorizing of the global resurgence of religion taking place in IR.
机译:可能的情况是,即使在10年前,在这个集合中提出的问题在国际关系研究中也将是一个非常令人惊讶的-甚至是一个异端-问题(IR;异端在挑战世俗自我意识的意义上)。对学科的了解)。对于许多学者而言,听到有关IR研究的“宗教复兴”或“宗教转向”的说法,仍可能是一个惊喜。该系列解决了以前稳定的概念,类别或区别的观念,这些观念,范畴或区别在欧洲或西方对于我们这些人来说几乎都是自然的概念或区别-构成宗教,神圣和世俗的东西-构成宗教,神圣和世俗的东西。政治上,甚至经济上的权力已经分散了,甚至可能由于对理论的影响以及IR中发生的全球宗教复兴的理论化而动摇了。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Critical Studies on Security》 |2016年第3期|319-326|共8页
  • 作者

    Scott M. Thomas;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Politics, Languages, and International Relations, University of Bath, Bath, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号