【24h】

Global justification and local legitimation

机译:全球理由和地方合法性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper distinguishes between the concepts of justification and legitimation with a view to offering a normative standard for global justice compatible with cultural pluralism. According to this distinction, justification is presented as an idealized, substantive and top-down enterprise rooted in the moral and metaphysical substrate of a specific culture. On the other hand, legitimation has a procedural and factual connotation and derives its strength from the success of some culturally independent but historically situated practice (bottom-up approach). Building on this distinction, I argue that justification and legitimation should be made complementary for the sake of cross-cultural dialogue.View full textDownload full textKeywordsglobal justice, justification, legitimation, cultural pluralism, human rightsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2012.651021
机译:本文对辩护和合法化的概念进行了区分,以期为与文化多元主义相适应的全球正义提供规范标准。根据这种区别,辩护是一种理想化,实质性和自上而下的企业,它植根于特定文化的道德和形而上学基础。另一方面,合法化具有程序和事实的含义,并从某些文化上独立但历史悠久的实践(自下而上的做法)的成功中获得力量。在这种区别的基础上,我认为,为了进行跨文化对话,应将证明和合法化作为补充。查看全文下载全文在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2012.651021

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号