首页> 外文期刊>Critical Public Health >Incorporating local knowledge(s) in health promotion
【24h】

Incorporating local knowledge(s) in health promotion

机译:将当地知识纳入健康促进

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Historically, Western liberal democracies have defined relevant knowledge for social and economic management as that produced by experts following established professional methods. As we experience a shift from government to governance, state departments and bodies have attempted to impose their own desire for this particular form of knowledge, typically constructed as quantitative performance measures, onto their community partners. This is done in the name of accountability. Health promotion, as practiced in government health agencies, faces these same pressures to demonstrate outcomes and successes from community work. However, this article argues that, rather than blindly following these imperatives characteristic of advanced liberalism, it will be more fruitful for health promotion to explore the potential of incorporating and employing local knowledge(s). This argument is illustrated through two brief examples drawn from population health initiatives in two regional health authorities in western Canada. Persistent pressure from community members and their advocates can open up professional and bureaucratic systems to allow new forms of information to influence judgment. Local knowledge(s) offer a unique contribution to health promotion practice. It is incumbent upon practitioners and government organizations to seek ways to engage and incorporate the insights that are only thus available.View full textDownload full textKeywordshealth promotion, accountability, local knowledge, performance measurement, governance, participationRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09581590902906187
机译:从历史上看,西方自由民主国家已将社会和经济管理的相关知识定义为专家们按照既定的专业方法所产生的知识。当我们经历了从政府到治理的转变时,州政府部门和机构试图将自己对这种特殊形式的知识的愿望强加给他们的社区伙伴,这些知识通常是作为量化的绩效指标而构建的。这是以问责制的名义完成的。按照政府卫生机构的做法,健康促进面临着同样的压力,需要证明社区工作的成果和成功。但是,本文认为,与其一味地遵循先进自由主义的这些必要条件,不如探索促进吸收和利用本地知识的潜力,对于健康促进将更加富有成果。通过加拿大西部两个地区卫生部门的人口卫生计划中的两个简短示例说明了这一论点。来自社区成员及其拥护者的持续压力可以开放专业和官僚体系,以允许新形式的信息影响判断。当地知识为健康促进实践做出了独特的贡献。从业者和政府组织有责任寻求方法,以吸收和吸收只有如此才能获得的见解。查看全文下载全文关键字健康促进,问责,本地知识,绩效衡量,治理,参与相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09581590902906187

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号