...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical Public Health >Tackling health inequalities in Norway: applying linear and non-linear models in the policy-making process
【24h】

Tackling health inequalities in Norway: applying linear and non-linear models in the policy-making process

机译:解决挪威的卫生不平等问题:在决策过程中应用线性和非线性模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This article follows the Norwegian policy-making process on social inequalities in health applying models for policy development with focus on linear and non-linear movements. The focus is process-oriented following the introduction of a comprehensive, cross-sectoral strategy to tackle socioeconomic health inequalities in Norway. A case study design was selected and two theoretical frameworks have guided the research. Whitehead's model for health inequality intervention (2007) follows a linear theory-based logic, underpinning the idea that implicit or explicit theories or formulation of a distinct problem causally predicts design and outcome of policy programmes. The second approach is based on Kingdon's (2003) perception that policy-making often occurs unpredictably within independent streams of the policy formulation process. The model focuses on the non-linearity of the flow and timing of policy action. The present case suggests that both linear and non-linear models are necessary for understanding of the Norwegian policy-making process on social inequalities in health. Whitehead's model is a conceptual model focussing on the linear structure of the policy process, useful for identifying the different entry points for choice of direction in policy-making. Kingdon's multiple streams model is useful for gaining insight into the agenda-setting process that may be predictable, but may also be unpredictable and steer non-linear movements. The model identifies components necessary for a problem to rise on the political agenda with a particular focus on the role of policy entrepreneurs.View full textDownload full textKeywordshealth inequalities, healthy public policy, health promotionRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2010.492210
机译:本文遵循挪威关于卫生保健中的社会不平等问题的政策制定过程,将政策制定模型应用于模型研究,重点是线性和非线性运动。在采取综合的跨部门战略以解决挪威的社会经济健康不平等问题之后,重点是面向过程。选择了案例研究设计,并且两个理论框架指导了研究。怀特海(Whitehead)的健康不平等干预模型(2007)遵循基于线性理论的逻辑,支持以下观念:隐性或显性理论或独特问题的表述可以预测政策计划的设计和结果。第二种方法是基于金登(Kingdon)(2003)的看法,即决策制定常常在政策制定过程的独立流中不可预测地发生。该模型着眼于政策行动流程和时间安排的非线性。本案例表明,线性和非线性模型对于理解挪威关于健康方面社会不平等的决策过程都是必要的。怀特海(Whitehead)的模型是一个概念模型,着眼于政策过程的线性结构,可用于确定决策方向选择的不同切入点。金登(Kingdon)的多流模型有助于获得对议程设置过程的见解,该过程可能是可以预测的,但也可能是不可预测的,并且可以指导非线性运动。该模型确定了问题在政治议程上引起关注的必要组成部分,特别着重于政策企业家的角色。查看全文下载全文关键字健康不平等,健康的公共政策,健康促进相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线” ,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2010.492210

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号