首页> 外文期刊>critical perspectives on international business >Management in emerging economies: modern but not too modern?
【24h】

Management in emerging economies: modern but not too modern?

机译:新兴经济体的管理:现代但又不是太现代?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose – This paper sets out to critically review recent publications on emerging market management, and propose an alternative, sociological approach, that emphasizes the hybridity of the emerging economy managerial class in the context of globalization. Design/methodology/approach – Through a critical exploration of three books on emerging economies, the paper questions the meaning of the concept of “modern” in emerging country management. A case study of the treatment of Dalit sanitary workers in New Delhi is used to illustrate the interlay between global marketization and pre-existing class and caste hierarchies. Findings – Globalization does not result in the replacement of “traditional” with “modern” in India but rather creates hybrid relationships of domination in which an emergent global managerial class is built on and intertwined with pre-existing class and caste hierarchies. This aspect of modernization is poorly understood in mainstream Indian management scholarship, and highlights the need for development of critical management studies within Indian business schools. Research limitations/implications – This is a complex and important topic, and the paper has only sketched a conceptual framework that requires further elaboration as well as empirical research. Practical implications – The debate around “modernization” in emerging economy management requires deepening. Normative issues regarding exploitation that have typically been applied only to the developed countries-emerging countries relationship need to be expanded to examine internal social dynamics within globalizing/emerging economies. Originality/value – The framework permits analysis of globalization beyond sterile pro- and anti-dualities. It helps in explaining why globalization is attractive to developing country élites. The paper is a basis for further development of critical globalization theory as it applies to developing and transitional economies/societies.
机译:目的–本文着眼于对新兴市场管理的最新出版物进行批判性评论,并提出一种替代的社会学方法,该方法强调全球化背景下新兴经济管理阶层的混合性。设计/方法论/方法–通过对三本有关新兴经济体的书籍进行批判性探索,本文对新兴国家管理中“现代”概念的含义提出了质疑。通过对新德里达利特卫生工作者待遇的案例研究,来说明全球市场化与既有阶级和种姓等级之间的关系。调查结果–全球化并不会导致印度的“传统”被“现代”取代,而是创造了一种混合的统治关系,在这种关系中,建立了一个新兴的全球管理阶层,并与原有的阶层和种姓等级制度交织在一起。在主流的印度管理奖学金中,人们对现代化的这一方面了解甚少,这凸显了在印度商学院内部发展关键管理研究的必要性。研究的局限性/含意-这是一个复杂而重要的主题,本文仅草绘了一个概念框架,需要进一步阐述和实证研究。实际意义–有关新兴经济管理中“现代化”的辩论需要加深。通常仅适用于发达国家与新兴国家关系的有关剥削的规范性问题需要扩大,以研究全球化/新兴经济体内的内部社会动力。原创性/价值–该框架允许对全球化进行分析,而不仅仅是对立和反对双重性。它有助于解释为什么全球化对发展中国家的精英具有吸引力。本文是批判全球化理论进一步发展的基础,因为它适用于发展中经济体和转型经济体/社会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号