首页> 外文期刊>Corporate Governance >Roles of academic directors on US Fortune 500 boards
【24h】

Roles of academic directors on US Fortune 500 boards

机译:学术主管在《财富》美国500强董事会中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to examine the prevalence of directors of US Fortune 500 firms who comernfrom an academic background, and possible unique reasons for their appointment.rnDesign/methodology/approach - Based on extant theory of the resource-dependence roles ofrnnon-management directors, this study proposes and tests three hypotheses concerning distinctivernreasons firms may appoint an academic to their boards. Academic directors may serve unique roles inrnincreasing board demographic diversity, increasing firm intellectual capital, and providing links to localrngeographic constituents. Using year 2002 data from the US Fortune 500 firms, this study presentsrndescriptive statistics and uses t-tests and x~2 tests to examine hypotheses.rnFindings - Firms having academics on their boards have greater board demographic diversity thanrnfirms without an academic director. Firms with academic directors have the same average emphasis onrnknowledge-based earnings as other firms. Academics associated with US top-ranked universities tendrnto be more likely to hold board seats. Firms tend to select academic directors from the geographicrnregions where the firm is headquartered and have a slight tendency to use them on public affairsrncommittees.rnResearch limitations/implications - This study's findings highlight a unique non-monitoringrnadvantage of academic directors for firms seeking increased board diversity, and potentialrncommunity/stakeholder liaisons.rnPractical implications - Firms wishing to increase board diversity or improve relationships with otherrnstakeholder groups may find academic directors useful to such efforts. Academic directors appear to bernjust as capable as other outside directors in developing firm intellectual capital.rnOriginality/value - This paper extends the present literature in resource dependence by examiningrnacademic directors, a new director subset. The paper is also unique in that it uses data collected fromrnproxy statements, rather than survey data.
机译:目的-本文旨在研究来自学术背景的美国财富500强企业董事的普遍性,以及任命他们的可能独特原因。rn设计/方法/方法-基于现任非管理董事资源依赖角色的理论,这项研究提出并检验了有关公司可能任命其学者为公司的独特原因的三个假设。学术主管可以发挥独特的作用,从而增加董事会人口的多样性,增加公司的智力资本并提供与本地地理成分的联系。使用美国财富500强公司2002年的数据,本研究提供了描述性统计数据,并使用t检验和x〜2检验来检验假设。rn发现-董事会中有学者的公司比没有学术总监的公司具有更大的董事会人口统计学差异。具有学术主管的公司与其他公司对基于知识的收益的平均重视程度相同。与美国一流大学相关的学者往往更有可能担任董事会席位。公司倾向于从公司总部所在的地理区域中选拔学术董事,并且倾向于在公共事务委员会中使用它们。研究限制/含义-该研究结果突显了学术董事对于寻求增加董事会多样性的公司的独特的非监控优势,实际意义-希望增加董事会成员多样性或改善与其他利益相关者团体的关系的公司可能会发现学术主管对此类工作很有用。学术董事似乎在发展公司智力资本方面具有与其他外部董事一样的能力。原创性/价值-本文通过研究学术性董事(一种新的董事子集)扩展了资源依赖方面的现有文献。该文件的独特之处还在于它使用从代理声明中收集的数据,而不是调查数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号