首页> 外文期刊>Control Theory & Applications, IET >Sliding mode fault-tolerant control of an octorotor using linear parameter varying-based schemes
【24h】

Sliding mode fault-tolerant control of an octorotor using linear parameter varying-based schemes

机译:使用基于线性参数变化的方案对八极管进行滑模容错控制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study presents two fault-tolerant control (FTC) schemes for an octorotor UAV. The FTC schemes are based on an linear parameter varying system representation and utilises a combination of sliding-mode ideas and control allocation (CA) in order to take full advantage of the available redundant rotors in the octorotor configuration. A detailed synthesis procedure for the design of the two FTC schemes in the presence of uncertainty, as well as faults/failures, is presented. The first scheme is based on an online CA methodology where knowledge of the rotor effectiveness level has been used to redistribute the control signals to the healthy rotors. The second scheme assumes that this information is not available and uses a fixed CA structure even in the event of faults/failures. Although the synthesis process for the two schemes is different and they use different strategies to redistribute the control signals when faults/failures occur, both schemes involved the same `baseline' (sliding-mode) controller which does not need to be reconfigured. The difference is in the final physical control law where the CA matrix is defined. Simulation results on the full non-linear octorotor model are presented for the two different schemes in the presence of uncertainty, sensor noise as well as faults/failures. The simulation results for various fault/failure scenarios show no visible degradation in state tracking performance, highlighting the potential of the proposed schemes.
机译:这项研究提出了两种用于容错无人机的容错控制(FTC)方案。 FTC方案基于线性参数变化的系统表示,并结合了滑模思想和控制分配(CA),以便充分利用八极电机配置中的可用冗余转子。给出了在存在不确定性以及故障/故障的情况下设计两种FTC方案的详细综合程序。第一种方案基于在线CA方法,其中已经使用了转子有效性水平的知识来将控制信号重新分配给正常转子。第二种方案假定此信息不可用,即使在出现故障/失败的情况下,也使用固定的CA结构。尽管这两种方案的综合过程不同,并且在发生故障/故障时它们使用不同的策略来重新分配控制信号,但两种方案都涉及相同的“基线”(滑模)控制器,无需重新配置。区别在于定义CA矩阵的最终物理控制法则。在存在不确定性,传感器噪声以及故障/故障的情况下,针对两种不同的方案,给出了全非线性八角电机模型的仿真结果。各种故障/故障情况的仿真结果表明,状态跟踪性能没有明显的下降,突出了所提出方案的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号