首页> 外文期刊>Contractor >T for C clauses set no limits on termination
【24h】

T for C clauses set no limits on termination

机译:T for C子句对终止没有设置任何限制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Back in the olden days of con-struction, once a contract was entered, the contractor had the right to complete it and be paid the full price. Over time, the concept of a "Termination for Convenience" (T for C) clause arose. By inserting this clause into a written contract, an owner avoided being sued for breach of contract if it changed its mind and wanted to pull the plug on a project.rnInitially seen in federal contracts, the theory was that the public interest was not served by forcing the government to either build something it no longer needed or pay damages for not doing so, if, in fact, there was a compelling "sovereign" reason to stop - such as a breakout of war or peace, or hazardous materials found on a site. The clause said that the owner would pay costs incurred to date and reasonable "termination expenses," meaning unavoidable costs incurred due to an early termination (i.e., uncancel-able material orders, restocking charges, unexpired rental contracts).
机译:回到过去的建筑时代,签订合同后,承包商有权完成合同并获得全价。随着时间的流逝,出现了“方便终止”(T表示C)子句的概念。通过将此条款插入书面合同中,所有者避免了因改变主意而想终止项目并因违反合同而被起诉的权利。最初在联邦合同中看到,该理论认为,公共利益并未得到满足。强迫政府要么建造不再需要的东西,要么不这样做而赔偿损失,如果事实上,有一个令人信服的“主权”理由制止,例如爆发战争或和平,或在战争现场发现有害物质现场。该条款说,所有者将支付迄今为止发生的费用和合理的“终止费用”,这是指由于提前终止而产生的不可避免的费用(即,不可取消的物料订单,进货费,未到期的租赁合同)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号