首页> 外文期刊>Contract Journal >Late adjudication decisions
【24h】

Late adjudication decisions

机译:迟裁决定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Since the Construction Act first came into force, adjudicators have been unsure about the question of whether they are entitled to withhold delivery of their decision until their fees have been paid. Many adjudicators seek to impose terms within the adjudication agreement to this effect. Many others consider such an arrangement is contrary to the statutory or contractual framework within which the adjudication is constituted. Connected to this question is the further question concerning whether, if an adjudicator does withhold his decision from the parties beyond the date for delivery of that decision pending payment of his fees, will the decision once delivered late be rendered unenforceable? These matters were examined in the recent case of St Andrews Bay Development -v- HBG Management in the Scottish Court of Session. St Andrews had engaged HBG to build a leisure complex at Kingask near St Andrews. The contract was based upon the Scottish equivalent of the JCT1998 With Contractor's Design form of contract.
机译:自《建筑法》生效以来,陪审员一直不确定是否有权在支付费用之前保留其决定。为此,许多裁判员试图在裁判协议中加入条款。许多其他人认为,这种安排违反了构成裁决的法定或合同框架。与这个问题有关的另一个问题是,如果裁定人确实在交付该决定的日期之后仍未向当事方隐瞒其决定,直到其缴纳费用后,该决定一旦延迟交付,是否将不可执行?苏格兰法院在最近的圣安德鲁斯湾开发-HBG管理案中对这些问题进行了审查。圣安德鲁斯已聘请HBG在圣安德鲁斯附近的Kingask建造休闲中心。该合同基于苏格兰的JCT1998合同,即承包商的设计合同形式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号