【24h】

An antinomy of political judgment: Kant, Arendt, and the role of purposiveness in reflective judgment

机译:政治判断的对立面:康德,阿伦特和目的性在反思性判断中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This article builds on Arendt’s development of a Kantian politics from out of the conception of reflective judgment in the Critique of Judgment. Arendt looks to Kant’s analysis of the beautiful to explain how political thought can be conceived. And yet Arendt describes such Kantian reflection as an empirical undertaking that justifies itself only in relation to the abstract principle of the moral law. The problem for such an account is that the autonomy of the moral law appears to be at odds with the social cohesion of Kantian political life. The ensuing contradiction can be deemed the antinomy of political judgment. Kant’s conception of reflective judgment offers such an inquiry considerably more to work with than Arendt uncovers. In particular, the regulative principle of the purposiveness of nature that is shown to direct all reflection can be seen to offer the solution to this antinomy.
机译:本文基于《审判批判》中反思性判断的概念,基于阿伦特对康德政治的发展。阿伦特期待康德对美女的分析,以解释如何构想政治思想。然而,阿伦特将这种康德式的反思描述为一种经验性的事业,仅在道德法的抽象原则方面证明其合理性。这种说法的问题在于,道德法的自治似乎与康德政治生活的社会凝聚力背道而驰。随后发生的矛盾可视为政治判断的对立性。康德的反思性判断概念比Arendt所揭示的,提供了更多这样的询问来进行工作。尤其是,可以证明指导所有反射的自然目的性调节原则可以为这种矛盾提供解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

联系方式:18141920177 (微信同号)

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号