首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary security policy >Constructing Ontological Insecurity: The Insecuritization of Britain's Muslims
【24h】

Constructing Ontological Insecurity: The Insecuritization of Britain's Muslims

机译:建构本体论的不安全感:英国穆斯林的不安全感

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The development of ontological security studies, for example by Mitzen, Steele, and Berenskoetter and Giegerich, has been an important innovation in the field. However, by focusing on the level of the state rather than that of the individual, this new tradition is somewhat different from the intellectual origins of ontological security in sociology and psychology. Drawing on those disciplines, I argue that the key focus should be on the understandings of individuals about their own security, intersubjectively constructed. Ontological security can be understood in terms of the need to construct biographical continuity, to construct a web of trust relations, to act in accordance with self-integrity, and to struggle against ontological insecurity, or dread, in Kierkegaard's sense. I then take and apply this framework to understand the process by which British Muslims have become insecuritized (understood as a term through which dominant power can decide who should be protected and who should be designated as those to be controlled, objectified, and feared) in the period since 9/11.
机译:例如,Mitzen,Steele和Berenskoetter和Giegerich进行的本体安全性研究的发展是该领域的一项重要创新。但是,通过关注国家而不是个人的水平,这一新传统与社会学和心理学中本体论安全的知识渊源有所不同。利用这些学科,我认为主要重点应该放在主体间的个人对自身安全的理解上。可以从建立传记连续性,建立信任关系网,按照自我完整性采取行动以及与本体论不安全或恐惧进行斗争的角度来理解本体安全,这是从Kierkegaard的角度而言的。然后,我采用并应用此框架,以了解英国穆斯林变得不安全的过程(可以理解为主导力量可以决定谁应该受到保护,谁应该被指定为要受到控制,客体化和恐惧的人)。自9/11以来的时期。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Contemporary security policy》 |2012年第2期|p.219-235a1|共18页
  • 作者

    STUART CROFT;

  • 作者单位

    University of Warwick, England;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号