首页> 外文期刊>Consulting-specifying engineer >Design-Build: Why not Engineers at the Helm?
【24h】

Design-Build: Why not Engineers at the Helm?

机译:设计建造:为什么不掌控工程师?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Who should lead a construction project? For many centuries, the answer was a simple one: the Master Builder, i.e., the architect. Then, for much of the 20th century, the answer became "the general contractor." For the past decade or so, however, that question has become a bit more difficult to answer, as the master builder concept resurfaced in the form of multiple design-build schemes. But just as everyone has an opinion on last night's ball game, no two parties see exactly eye-to-eye as to who should lead construction projects. Many are GC-led; some combine design and construction under one roof in an "integrated services" model. But some intrepid designers are looking to go even further by using design-build as an opportunity to putthe M/E/P engineer in the driver's seat.
机译:谁应该领导建设项目?在许多世纪以来,答案都是一个简单的答案:大师建造者,即建筑师。然后,在20世纪的大部分时间里,答案变成了“总承包商”。然而,在过去的十年左右的时间里,这个问题变得更加难以回答,因为主建造者的概念以多种设计建造方案的形式浮出水面。但是,正如每个人都对昨晚的球赛有不同的看法一样,没有哪两个政党在谁应该领导建设项目方面一目了然。许多是由GC领导的;有些采用“集成服务”模型将设计和建造结合在一起。但是,一些勇敢的设计师希望通过使用设计构建作为将M / E / P工程师放到驾驶员座位上的机会来走得更远。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号