1. In Bridge Communications v Abbey Pynford the cost of wasted staff time was recoverable even though no 'loss', from additional expenditure, could be shown. 2. In the absence of a record of hours worked, evidence in the form of a reconstruction from memory is acceptable. 3. A split claim is justified only if it can be shown that there is no overlap between the two claims. 4. Claims for interest may be assessed according to the borrowing rate appropriate for the size of business.
展开▼
机译：1.在Bridge Communications v Abbey Pynford案中，可以证明浪费的员工时间成本是可以弥补的，即使没有显示来自额外支出的“损失”。 2.在没有工作时间记录的情况下，以记忆形式重建的证据是可以接受的。 3.仅在能够证明两个权利要求之间没有重叠的情况下，才可提出分开的权利要求。 4.利息索赔可以根据适合企业规模的借款利率进行评估。
展开▼
