首页> 外文期刊>Construction News >Why two-stage tendering can be better than one
【24h】

Why two-stage tendering can be better than one

机译:为什么两阶段招标可以比一个更好

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two-stage tendering is often cited as a tool for efficient procurement. We are told it offers clients the opportunity to get value for money while improving 'buildability' by engaging contractors at an early stage in the process. Yet for many years it still seems to have been regarded with suspicion among developers or, at the very least, as something less desirable than traditional single-stage tendering. We can only guess whether the reluctance of the market to embrace two-stage tendering reflects the pre-eminence of 'cost certainty from the outset' as the most essential criterion for clients, or whether it is a lack of familiarity or awareness.
机译:两阶段招标通常被称为有效采购的工具。我们被告知,通过在过程的早期阶段与承包商合作,可以为客户提供物有所值的机会,同时提高“可建造性”。然而,多年来,开发商似乎一直对此表示怀疑,或者至少与传统的单阶段招标相比,这种想法不那么可取。我们只能猜测,市场对两阶段招标的不情愿是否反映了“从一开始就确定成本”作为客户最基本的准则,还是缺乏熟悉度或意识。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Construction News》 |2015年第7420期|2224|共2页
  • 作者

    ALAN WOOLSTON;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号