首页> 外文期刊>Construction Europe >Canal dispute decision
【24h】

Canal dispute decision

机译:运河争议决定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A dispute adjudication board (DAB) has found in favour of Grupo Unidos por el Canal (GUPC), the contractor consortium working on the Panama Canal expansion, ruling that the client, the Panama Canal Authority (ACP), should pay US$234 million (€206 million) to GUPC and extend the contract period for six months. Concerns over the quality of basalt to be used as aggregates on the project were at the centre of the dispute. There were also issues over a delay on ACP's part in approving the concrete mix to be used on the project. GUPC, which is formed by Sacyr of Spain, Salini Impregilo of Italy, Jan De Nul of Belgium and Constructora Urban SA (CUSA) of Panama, said the issue of basalt quality was raised as early as February 2011. It said it had discovered that the rock was not of the same quality as indicated in the bidding documents issued by ACP.
机译:争端裁决委员会(DAB)裁定,致力于巴拿马运河扩建的承包商财团Grupo Unidos por el Canal(GUPC)获胜,裁定客户巴拿马运河管理局(ACP)应支付2.34亿美元(向GUPC提供2.06亿欧元),并将合同期限延长六个月。争议的焦点是该项目中用作玄武岩集料的玄武岩质量。在ACP批准用于该项目的混凝土混合物方面,还有一些延误问题。由西班牙的Sacyr,意大利的Salini Impregilo,比利时的Jan De Nul和巴拿马的Constructora Urban SA(CUSA)组成的GUPC表示,玄武岩质量的问题早在2011年2月就提出来了。它说,它发现了该岩石的质量与ACP发出的招标文件中所示的质量不同。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Construction Europe》 |2015年第1期|10-10|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号