首页> 外文期刊>Construction and Building Materials >Investigation of using recycled powder from waste of clay bricks and cement solids in reactive powder concrete
【24h】

Investigation of using recycled powder from waste of clay bricks and cement solids in reactive powder concrete

机译:活性粉末混凝土中利用粘土砖和水泥固体废料回收粉的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recycled powder, produced from the construction and demolition wastes, contains unhydrated cement particles. It can reduce environment pollution to use recycled powder as a cementing material. It is investigated to use recycled powder to partially replace silica fume or cement in Reactive Powder Concrete (RPC) to develop environmentally-friendly and cost-saving RPC mixture with high performance. Properties of the recycled powder are tested firstly. And according to maximum packing theory, the RPC mix with the recycled powder is designed. Influences of the fine aggregate, quartz and natural sand, on the RPC are investigated. The water-cementitious materials ratio (w/cm) for RPC mixes with the recycled powder are studied and selected. The recycled powder is used to replace the silica fume and cement in RPC respectively, and influences of the replacement ratio on the flowability, strength and durability are investigated. The standard curing is used for all the tests instead of steam curing normally required for RPC. Considering the flowability, strength, durability, cost and environmental savings, it is suggested that the recycled powder can be used to replace the silica fume and cement in RPC partially, and natural sand can be used instead of quartz. Additionally, influences of GGBFS powder on RPC mix with the recycled powder are investigated. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:从建筑废料和拆除废料中产生的再生粉中含有未水合的水泥颗粒。使用再生粉作为胶结材料可以减少环境污染。已研究使用再生粉末部分替代活性粉末混凝土(RPC)中的硅粉或水泥,从而开发出高性能,环保且节省成本的RPC混合物。首先测试再生粉末的性能。并且根据最大包装理论,设计了与再生粉末混合的RPC混合物。研究了细骨料,石英和天然砂对RPC的影响。研究并选择了RPC混合物与再生粉末的水硬性材料比率(w / cm)。用回收的粉末分别代替RPC中的硅粉和水泥,研究了置换比例对流动性,强度和耐久性的影响。所有测试均使用标准固化,而不是RPC通常所需的蒸汽固化。考虑到流动性,强度,耐用性,成本和节省环境,建议使用回收的粉末部分替代RPC中的硅粉和水泥,并可以使用天然砂代替石英。此外,还研究了GGBFS粉末对RPC与再生粉末混合的影响。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Construction and Building Materials》 |2016年第15期|246-254|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Tongji Univ, Dept Struct Engn, 1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China;

    Tongji Univ, Dept Struct Engn, 1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China|Qingdao Agr Univ, Dept Engn, 700 Changcheng Rd, Qingdao 266109, Peoples R China;

    Tongji Univ, Dept Struct Engn, 1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China;

    Tongji Univ, Dept Struct Engn, 1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China;

    Univ Tennessee, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA|Southwest jiaotong Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Recycled powder; Reactive powder concrete; Strength; Flowability; Shrinkage; Chloride penetration;

    机译:再生粉末;活性粉末混凝土;强度;流动性;收缩率;氯离子渗透性;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号