首页> 外文期刊>Construction and Building Materials >Evaluation of different analysis approaches for Hamburg Wheel-Tracking testing (HWTT) data
【24h】

Evaluation of different analysis approaches for Hamburg Wheel-Tracking testing (HWTT) data

机译:评估汉堡轮跟踪测试(HWTT)数据的不同分析方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Test (HWTT) has remained a very robust method for characterizing asphalt mixtures due to its ability to simulate field loading conditions. Despite the popularity of the HWTT, there is no standardized step-by-step procedure for analyzing HWTT data according to AASTHO T 324. This has resulted in the proliferation of plausible approaches for analyzing HWTT data. This study identifies and investigates the merits and limitations of available HWTT analysis approaches. An online survey conducted shows that the Iowa DOT approach is the most popular methodology adopted for HWTT analysis. Moreover, other approaches like the Novel Three-Parameter approach, Combined Franken-Power approach, Third-Order Curvature approach, and some other algorithm-based approaches are shown to be useful in accurately analyzing HWTT data. Based on the evaluated analysis methods, recommendations are made to eliminate subjectivity, reduce variability in HWTT results, and obtain result parameters that can effectively discriminate between asphalt mixtures. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:汉堡轮跟踪试验(HWTT)仍然是一种非常稳健的方法,用于表征沥青混合物由于其模拟现场装载条件的能力。尽管HWTT的普及,但没有标准化的逐步步骤,用于根据AASTHO T 324分析HWTT数据。这导致了用于分析HWTT数据的合理方法的增殖。本研究识别并调查可用HWTT分析方法的优点和限制。进行了在线调查表明,爱荷华州DOT方法是HWTT分析采用的最受欢迎的方法。此外,像新颖的三参数方法一样,弗里克伦 - 电力方法,三阶曲率方法和一些其他基于算法的方法的其他方法被证明是可用于准确分析HWTT数据的方法。基于评估的分析方法,建议消除主观性,降低HWTT结果的可变性,并获得能够有效地区分沥青混合物的结果参数。 (c)2021 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号