首页> 外文期刊>Construction and Building Materials >Thermal insulation of roofs by using multiple air gaps separated by insulating layers of low infrared emissivity
【24h】

Thermal insulation of roofs by using multiple air gaps separated by insulating layers of low infrared emissivity

机译:通过使用由低红外发射率的隔热层隔开的多个气隙对屋顶进行隔热

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In recent work we have demonstrated the ability of a new thermal insulation design based on creating air cavities between parallel layers of insulation material with a low infrared emissivity (Expanded Polystyrene, 0.6) and the multimodal heat transfer involved (conduction, convection, and radiation) was modeled for walls. Now, this modeling is developed for roofs, regarding the different heat convection mechanisms involved in both slender air cavities, the vertical (walls) and horizontal (roofs) ones. Another difference is that the air convection is null in a top-heated cavity (roofs in summer) meanwhile this mechanism is active in a bottom-heated cavity (roofs in winter) and so, the optimized design is different in both cases. We studied two designs based on multiple EPS layers of 1 cm thickness, namely: EPSW, which takes advantage of the low emissivity of the white EPS (0.6); and EPSF, which adds an aluminum foil of very-low emissivity (0.04) to each EPS layer. Considering roofs in winter, the EPSW design achieves thermal transmittances ranging from 0.447 W/(m(2).K) to 0.096 Wi(m(2).K) for 4 to 17 layers, respectively, obtaining material savings up to 53% compared to solid EPS insulation. On the other hand, the EPSF design leads to thermal transmittances ranging from 0.238 W/(m(2).K) to 0.040 W/(m(2).K) for 4 to 17 layers, respectively, obtaining material savings up to 81% regarding solid EPS insulation. For summer conditions, the improvement in insulation is limited by the presence of infrared radiation and very hot roof temperatures in warm climates. An intended thermal transmittance of 0.1 W/(m(2).K) can be hardly achieved by using 14 layers of EPSW, whereas it can be obtained with just three EPSF layers, although it implies additional burdens in embodied energy and contaminated emissions to the atmosphere. Therefore, we conclude that the simplest EPSW design is suitable for cold climates meanwhile the EPSF design is preferred for warm climates. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在最近的工作中,我们已经证明了一种新的隔热设计的能力,该设计基于在具有低红外发射率(膨胀聚苯乙烯,0.6)和涉及的多峰传热(传导,对流和辐射)的平行隔热材料层之间形成气孔是为墙壁建模的。现在,该模型是针对屋顶而开发的,考虑到细长气孔(垂直(墙)和水平(屋顶))中涉及的不同热对流机制。另一个区别是,在顶部加热的空腔(夏季的屋顶)中,空气对流为零,而在底部加热的空腔(冬季的屋顶)中,此机制起作用。因此,两种情况下的优化设计都不同。我们研究了基于1厘米厚的多个EPS层的两种设计,即:EPSW,它利用了白色EPS(0.6)的低发射率; EPSF,它在每个EPS层上添加了辐射率极低(0.04)的铝箔。考虑到冬天的屋顶,EPSW设计可实现4到17层的热透射率分别为0.447 W /(m(2).K)至0.096 Wi(m(2).K),可节省多达53%的材料与固态EPS绝缘相比。另一方面,EPSF设计导致4到17层的热透射率分别为0.238 W /(m(2).K)至0.040 W /(m(2).K),从而节省了高达固体EPS绝缘为81%。对于夏季条件,由于在温暖的气候中存在红外辐射和极热的屋顶温度,因此绝缘的改善受到限制。通过使用14层EPSW几乎无法达到预期的0.1 W /(m(2).K)的热透射率,而仅使用3层EPSF就可以达到预期的热透射率,尽管这暗示了在实现能量和污染排放方面的额外负担。气氛。因此,我们得出结论,最简单的EPSW设计适合于寒冷气候,而EPSF设计则适合于温暖气候。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号