首页> 外文期刊>Conflict, security & development >The 'responsibility to protect' in natural disasters: another excuse for interventionism? Nargis Cyclone, Myanmar
【24h】

The 'responsibility to protect' in natural disasters: another excuse for interventionism? Nargis Cyclone, Myanmar

机译:自然灾害中的“保护责任”:干预主义的另一个借口?缅甸纳吉斯飓风

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The 'responsibility to protect' (R2P) places the 'international community' under an obligation to take coercive action for the protection of lives in the circumstances of genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. Following the dismal response to the May 2008 cyclone disaster in Myanmar where many affected people were provided with almost no relief assistance by the country's military regime that also hampered external assistance, the idea of military humanitarian intervention under the rubric of R2P was proposed by Bernard Kouchner. However, considering the urgency of the provision of relief assistance in an emergency, which is often a matter of life or death, this paper questions the effectiveness of invoking R2P as a possible response strategy in the aftermath of natural disasters. Therefore, in relation to state sovereignty the paper focuses on the concept of 'humanitarian diplomacy' at macro and micro levels as an alternative strategy and having analysed the issue in the wider framework of humanitarianism, the paper concludes with the importance of exploring the opportunities provided by humanitarian diplomacy before invoking R2P in the context of natural disasters.
机译:“保护责任”(R2P)使“国际社会”有义务在灭绝种族,战争罪行,种族清洗和危害人类罪的情况下采取强制行动保护生命。继2008年5月发生的缅甸飓风灾难后,该国军事政权几乎没有向他们提供任何救济援助,这也阻碍了外部援助,缅甸对此做出了令人沮丧的反应,贝尔纳德·库什纳(Bernard Kouchner)提出了在R2P原则下进行军事人道主义干预的想法。 。但是,考虑到紧急情况下提供救灾援助的紧迫性(通常是生死攸关的问题),本文对在自然灾害后将R2P用作可能的应对策略的有效性提出了质疑。因此,关于国家主权,本文着眼于宏观和微观层面上的“人道主义外交”概念作为替代策略,并在更广泛的人道主义框架内分析了这一问题,得出结论,探索提供的机会的重要性在自然灾害的背景下调用R2P之前,通过人道主义外交进行。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Conflict, security & development》 |2010年第5期|p.693-713|共21页
  • 作者

    Alpaslan Oezerdem;

  • 作者单位

    The Centre for Peace and Reconciliation Studies, Coventry University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:39:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号