首页> 外文期刊>Computers & operations research >Infinite-horizon models for inventory control under yield uncertainty and disruptions
【24h】

Infinite-horizon models for inventory control under yield uncertainty and disruptions

机译:产量不确定和中断下的库存控制的无限水平模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We consider a firm facing supply chain risk in two forms: disruptions and yield uncertainty. We demonstrate the importance of analyzing a sufficiently long time horizon when modeling inventory systems subject to supply disruptions. Several previous papers have used single-period newsboy-style models to study supply disruptions, and we show that such models underestimate the risk of supply disruptions and generate sub-optimal solutions. We consider one case where a firm's only sourcing option is an unreliable supplier subject to disruptions and yield uncertainty, and a second case where a second, reliable (but more expensive) supplier is available. We develop models for both cases to determine the optimal order and reserve quantities. We then compare these results to those found when a single-period approximation is used. We demonstrate that a single-period approximation causes increases in cost, under-utilizes the unreliable supplier, and distorts the order quantities that should be placed with the reliable supplier in the two-supplier case. Moreover, using a single-period model can lead to selecting the wrong strategy for mitigating supply risk.
机译:我们认为一家公司面临两种形式的供应链风险:中断和收益不确定性。我们证明了在建模受供应中断影响的库存系统时分析足够长的时间范围的重要性。先前的几篇论文都使用单周期报童式模型来研究供应中断,并且我们证明了此类模型低估了供应中断的风险并产生了次优的解决方案。我们考虑一种情况,即一个公司唯一的采购选择是一个不可靠的供应商,该供应商容易受到中断和产量不确定性的影响,而第二种情况是,可以使用第二个可靠的(但价格更高的)供应商。我们针对这两种情况开发模型,以确定最佳订单和储备数量。然后,我们将这些结果与使用单周期近似时的结果进行比较。我们证明,单周期近似会导致成本增加,未充分利用不可靠的供应商,并且会扭曲在两个供应商的情况下应向可靠供应商下的订单数量。此外,使用单周期模型可能会导致选择错误的策略来降低供应风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号