首页> 外文期刊>Computers in Human Behavior >Do educational affordances and gratifications drive intensive Facebook use among adolescents?
【24h】

Do educational affordances and gratifications drive intensive Facebook use among adolescents?

机译:教育津贴和满足感会促使青少年大量使用Facebook吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Adolescents are active users of Facebook and are spending an increasing amount of their daily time on its use. Several recent studies have advocated the need to integrate Facebook use into our existing educational practices. However, at the same time, scholars and educators are wary of the fact that intensive Facebook use (IFU) may not translate into educational uses, learning outcomes and academic well-being. IFU represents an important service use concept that evaluates any user's emotional attachment, connectivity and integration with Facebook use. To address this gap, the present study investigated the role of different Facebook U&G and educational affordances in predicting the IFU among adolescents. A crosssectional study with 942 adolescent Facebook users from India was conducted. The study results suggest that content U&G did not, while process, technology and social. U&G did, play significant roles in predicting IFU. In comparison to Facebook U&G, different educational affordances, namely perceptions of Facebook use in Mathematics, Science and English education, perceptions of its formal use in classrooms and academic information seeking and sharing, did not significantly predict IFU. The study concludes with various theoretical and practical implications for scholars, educational solution developers, pedagogical experts as well as education policy makers. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:青少年是Facebook的活跃用户,并且每天在使用它上的时间越来越多。最近的几项研究主张需要将Facebook使用整合到我们现有的教育实践中。但是,与此同时,学者和教育者对Facebook大量使用(IFU)可能无法转化为教育用途,学习成果和学术福祉这一事实保持警惕。 IFU代表了一个重要的服务使用概念,该概念可评估任何用户的情感依恋,连接性以及与Facebook使用的集成。为了解决这一差距,本研究调查了不同的Facebook U&G和教育能力在预测青少年IFU中的作用。与来自印度的942名青少年Facebook用户进行了一项横断面研究。研究结果表明,内容U&G不在流程,技术和社交方面。 U&G在预测IFU中发挥了重要作用。与Facebook U&G相比,不同的教育能力(即对数学,科学和英语教育中使用Facebook的认知,对课堂中正式使用Facebook以及寻求和共享学术信息的认知)并未显着预测IFU。研究结束时对学者,教育解决方案开发人员,教学专家以及教育政策制定者具有各种理论和实践意义。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号