首页> 外文期刊>Computers & geosciences >Probabilistic evaluation of above-zone pressure and geochemical monitoring for leakage detection at geological carbon sequestration site
【24h】

Probabilistic evaluation of above-zone pressure and geochemical monitoring for leakage detection at geological carbon sequestration site

机译:地质碳封存现场的地上压力探测概率估算和地球化学监测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Above-zone monitoring has been proposed as a promising technique for monitoring geological carbon sequestration (GCS) projects for storage integrity. This study presents a probabilistic framework to assess and compare effectiveness of above-zone monitoring of pressure and geochemical parameters for the pilot GCS project at the Cranfield site. Pressure responses in the above-zone monitoring interval (AZMI) to leaks were modeled with a single-phase flow equation and solved analytically and geochemical responses were modeled with a solute transport equation coupled with geochemical reactions, such as mineral dissolution, aqueous complexation, cation exchange, caused by intrusion of the leaked fluids having lower pH and solved semi-analytically. A total of one million realizations were generated using the Monte-Carlo method in terms of 11 parameters required to calculate pressure and geochemical responses to leaks in the AZMI. For each individual realization, time to detect leaks in the AZMI was estimated with pressure with threshold values 200 MPa, 2000 MPa, and 10000 MPa or geochemical parameter (dissolved CO2 in groundwater) with threshold values of 2.33 mmol/kg H2O, 2.82 mmol/kg H2O, 6.94 mmol/kg H2O as indicator and further analyzed statistically over the one million realizations. Our results show that pressure monitoring can detect more than 90% of the leaks whereas geochemical monitoring can detect only up to 50% of the leaks. Detection time ranges from several hours to 200 days for pressure monitoring and from 1 year to 30 years for geochemical monitoring, suggesting that pressure monitoring can provide much early leakage detection. The local relative and global sensitivity analyses were conducted to rank relative importance of the model parameters. Our results show that detection time is sensitive to distance of monitoring well, leakage rate, thickness of the AZMI, and permeability. The global sensitivity analysis shows that the total indices are much higher than the first-order indices, indicating that interactions among the model parameters are crucial to detection time. The probabilistic framework presented in this study can be easily applied to the site configurations of other commercial-scale GCS projects.
机译:已经提出了区域上方监视作为监视地质碳封存(GCS)项目的存储完整性的有前途的技术。这项研究提供了一个概率框架,用于评估和比较Cranfield站点的GCS试点项目的压力和地球化学参数的区域以上监测的有效性。使用单相流方程对上述区域监测区间(AZMI)中的压力响应进行建模,并进行解析求解,并使用溶质运移方程与地球化学反应(例如矿物溶解,水络合,阳离子)耦合对地球化学响应进行建模交换是由于渗入的pH值较低且半解析地解决的渗漏流体引起的。使用蒙特卡洛方法,根据计算AZMI泄漏的压力和地球化学响应所需的11个参数,总共产生了100万个实现。对于每个单独的实现,使用阈值分别为200 MPa,2000 MPa和10000 MPa的压力或阈值为2.33 mmol / kg H2O,2.82 mmol / l的地球化学参数(地下水中溶解的CO2)来估计检测AZMI泄漏的时间。 kg H2O,6.94 mmol / kg H2O作为指示剂,并在100万实现中进行了进一步的统计分析。我们的结果表明,压力监测可以检测到90%以上的泄漏,而地球化学监测只能检测到多达50%的泄漏。压力监测的检测时间从几小时到200天不等,地球化学监测的检测时间从1年到30年不等,这表明压力监测可以提供很多早期泄漏检测。进行了局部相对和全局敏感性分析以对模型参数的相对重要性进行排名。我们的结果表明,检测时间对监测井的距离,泄漏率,AZMI的厚度和渗透率敏感。全局敏感性分析表明,总指标远高于一阶指标,表明模型参数之间的相互作用对检测时间至关重要。本研究中介绍的概率框架可以轻松地应用于其他商业规模GCS项目的站点配置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号