...
首页> 外文期刊>Computers,environment and urban systems >Live-Work-Play Centers of Chinese cities: Identification and temporal evolution with emerging data
【24h】

Live-Work-Play Centers of Chinese cities: Identification and temporal evolution with emerging data

机译:中国城市的现场工作娱乐中心:新兴数据的识别和时间演变

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Live-Work-Play (LWP) center, as a more comprehensive profile of a city center, has attracted increasing attention in recent years. This paper proposes a straightforward framework for identifying and evaluating LWP centers using ubiquitously available points of interest (POIs) as a proxy for urban function. The framework is then applied to 285 Chinese cities. The results show that 35 Chinese cities in 2014 had polycentric urban structures, increasing from 23 cities in 2009. The temporal evolution of the LWP centers of Chinese cities can be better understood as three types of evolution, differentiated by the number of LWP centers, their morphology and location. First, more polycentric cities emerged in 2014 in comparison with 2009. Second, the morphological change type can be further classified as “relative dispersion”, “relative concentration”, and “absolute concentration”. Third, the location change type can be classified into five types: displacement, division, fusion, emerging, and recession. In the final experiment, the regression results show that larger population and greater road junction density significantly contribute to LWP center formation.
机译:实时工作娱乐(LWP)中心作为城市中心的更全面描述,近年来受到越来越多的关注。本文提出了一个直接框架,该框架使用普遍存在的兴趣点(POI)作为城市功能的代理来识别和评估LWP中心。该框架随后应用于285个中国城市。结果表明,从2009年的23个城市开始,2014年中国有35个城市具有多中心城市结构。中国城市LWP中心的时间演变可以更好地理解为三种演变类型,按LWP中心的数量,它们的中心形态和位置。首先,与2009年相比,2014年出现了更多的多中心城市。其次,形态变化类型可以进一步分为“相对分散”,“相对集中度”和“绝对集中度”。第三,位置改变类型可以分为五种类型:位移,分割,融合,新兴和衰退。在最终实验中,回归结果表明,更大的人口和更大的路口密度显着促进了LWP中心的形成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号