首页> 外文期刊>Computers & education >In the mind and in the technology: The vicarious presence of the teacher in pupil's learning of science in collaborative group activity at the interactive whiteboard
【24h】

In the mind and in the technology: The vicarious presence of the teacher in pupil's learning of science in collaborative group activity at the interactive whiteboard

机译:在思想和技术上:在交互式白板上的协作小组活动中,教师在学生学习科学中的替代性存在

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The focus of research into the use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in the classroom has been largely in relation to teacher-pupil interaction, with very little consideration of its possible use as a tool for pupils' collaborative endeavour. This paper is based upon an ESRC-funded project,1 which considers how pupils use the interactive whiteboard when working together on science-related activities. It provides an analysis of video and other data from science lessons in UK Years 4 and 5 primary classrooms (pupils aged 8-10 years). Concentrating on a series of lessons constructed by three (out of 12) of the project teachers, together with their written and spoken commentaries, it takes each set of lessons as a case for study and comparison.rnThis paper focuses in particular on the nature of the 'vicarious presence' of the teacher evident in the group interactions at the board. We address the following questions: How is the teacher's vicarious presence evident in the work of pupils at the interactive whiteboard? How does this presence influence the behaviour of pupils engaged in science activities?rnIn this account, we suggest that the teacher remotely mediates the activity of the pupils at the board in two specific and interlinked ways. Firstly, the vicarious presence of the teacher seems to be in the minds of pupils, enabling them to appropriate and use introduced rules and procedures, in this case in relation to group talk. Secondly, it is in the ways in which the constructed task environment on the IWB guides and mediates the pupils' actions, enabling them to connect with, interpret and act upon the teacher intentions for the task. Here, the teacher's vicarious presence is in the technology.rnWe conclude that the IWB can provide both a tool and an environment that can encourage the creation of a shared dialogic space within which co-constructed knowledge building can take place. However, this only occurs where there is active support from the teacher for collaborative, dialogic activity in the classroom and where the teacher is able to devise tasks that use board affordances to promote active learning and pupil agency.
机译:研究在教室中使用交互式白板(IWB)的重点主要与师生互动有关,而很少考虑将其用作学生合作努力的工具。本文基于ESRC资助的项目1,该项目考虑了学生在开展与科学有关的活动时如何使用交互式白板。它提供了对英国4年级和5年级小学班级(8-10岁学生)科学课中视频和其他数据的分析。重点研究由三名(十二名)项目教师构建的一系列课程,以及他们的书面和口头评论,以每组课程为研究和比较的案例。rn本文特别关注课程的性质。在董事会的小组互动中,可以明显看出教师的“有风度”。我们解决以下问题:在交互式白板上,学生的工作如何体现出教师的替代作用?这种存在如何影响从事科学活动的学生的行为?rn在此说明中,我们建议老师以两种特定且相互联系的方式远程协调董事会中学生的活动。首先,在学生的脑海中似乎出现了教师的替代角色,使他们能够适应并使用引入的规则和程序,在这种情况下,与小组讨论有关。其次,通过这种方式,在IWB上构建的任务环境可以指导和调解学生的行为,使他们能够与教师联系,解释并根据教师的意图采取行动。在这里,教师的替代能力就在于技术。我们得出结论,IWB既可以提供工具,也可以提供鼓励建立共享对话空间的环境,在其中可以构建共同构建的知识。但是,只有在老师积极支持教室中的协作性对话活动并且老师能够制定任务以利用董事会津贴来促进积极学习和学生活动的情况下,这种情况才会发生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号