...
首页> 外文期刊>Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering >Improved coupling of finite element method with material point method based on a particle-to-surface contact algorithm
【24h】

Improved coupling of finite element method with material point method based on a particle-to-surface contact algorithm

机译:基于粒子与表面接触算法的有限元方法与材料点方法的改进耦合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For extreme deformation problems, material point method (MPM) takes competitive advantages compared with finite element method (FEM) which often encounters mesh distortion. However, for small deformation problems, FEM is still more efficient and accurate than MPM in most cases. Hence, a coupled finite element material point (CFEMP) method and an adaptive finite element material point method (AFEMP) have been proposed by our group to take advantages of both methods. Because the coupling between MPM particles and FEM elements was implemented based on the MPM grid-based contact method, both CFEMP and AFEMP demand a high degree of consistence of meshing between FEM domain and MPM domain. This may lead to over meshing in FEM domain, thus significantly decreases the time step size and increases computational cost as well as data storage. In order to allow arbitrary inconsistent meshing, the CFEMP and AFEMP methods are further improved in this article. The coupling between the MPM particles and FEM elements is implemented based on a particle-to-surface contact algorithm rather than the MPM grid-based contact method, so that the consistent meshing is no more needed. Thus, the meshing of FEM body can be much coarser than the MPM grid. Numerical studies illustrate that the robustness, efficiency and accuracy of the improved CFEMP (ICFEMP) method and the improved AFEMP (IAFEMP) method are much higher than MPM, CFEMP and AFEMP. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:对于极端变形问题,与经常遇到网格变形的有限元方法(FEM)相比,材料点方法(MPM)具有竞争优势。但是,对于小变形问题,在大多数情况下,FEM仍比MPM更为有效和准确。因此,我们的小组提出了耦合有限元材料点方法(CFEMP)和自适应有限元材料点方法(AFEMP)来利用这两种方法的优势。因为MPM粒子和FEM元素之间的耦合是基于基于MPM网格的接触方法实现的,所以CFEMP和AFEMP都要求FEM域和MPM域之间的网格划分高度一致。这可能会导致FEM域中的过度网格化,从而显着减小时间步长并增加计算成本以及数据存储。为了允许任意不一致的网格划分,本文进一步改进了CFEMP和AFEMP方法。 MPM粒子和FEM元素之间的耦合是基于粒子到表面的接触算法而不是基于MPM网格的接触方法实现的,因此不再需要一致的网格划分。因此,FEM主体的网格可以比MPM网格粗得多。数值研究表明,改进的CFEMP(ICFEMP)方法和改进的AFEMP(IAFEMP)方法的鲁棒性,效率和准确性远高于MPM,CFEMP和AFEMP。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号