...
首页> 外文期刊>Computer law & security report >Governing digital societies: Private platforms, public values
【24h】

Governing digital societies: Private platforms, public values

机译:管理数字社会:私人平台,公共价值观

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Online digital platforms have deeply penetrated every sector in society, disrupting markets, labor relations and institutions, while transforming social and civic practices. Moreover, platform dynamics have affected the very core of democratic processes and political communication. After a decade of platform euphoria, in which tech companies were celebrated for empowering ordinary users, problems have been mounting over the past three years. Disinformation, fake news, and hate speech spread via YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook poisoned public discourse and influenced elections. The Facebook-Cambridge Analytica scandal epitomized the many privacy breaches and security leaks dogging social media networks. Further compounded by charges of tax evasion and the undermining of fair labor laws, big tech companies are facing a serious 'techlash'. As some argued, the promotion of longstanding public values such as tolerance, democracy, and transparency are increasingly compromised by the global 'exports' of American tech companies which dominate the online infrastructure for the distribution of online cultural goods: news, video, social talk, and private communication (Geltzer & Gosh, 2018). As extensively discussed in our book 'The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connected World', the digitization and `platformization' of societies involve several intense struggles between competing ideological systems and their contesting actors, prompting important questions: Who should be responsible for anchoring public values in platform societies that are driven by algorithms and fueled by data? What kind of public values should be negotiated? And how can European citizens and governments guard certain social and cultural values while being dependent on a platform ecosystem which architecture is based on commercial values and is rooted in a neolibertarian world view? (C) 2019 Jose van Dijck. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在线数字平台深深地渗透了社会中的每个部门,扰乱了市场,劳动关系和机构,同时改变了社会和公民实践。此外,平台动态影响了民主程序和政治交流的核心。经过十年的平台兴奋之后,在哪些科技公司被庆祝赋予普通用户权力,在过去三年中有问题一直在安装。通过YouTube,Twitter和Facebook中毒的公众话语和影响选举,伪造,假新闻和仇恨演讲。 Facebook-Cambridge Analytica Scandal展示了许多隐私违规和安全泄漏沟通社交媒体网络。通过税收逃犯和破坏公平劳动法,大型科技公司面临严重的“Techlash”进一步复杂化。正如一些人认为,促进长期的公共价值观,如容忍,民主和透明度,越来越受到美国科技公司的全球“出口”,这些公司在线基础设施支配在线文化商品:新闻,视频,社交谈话和私人沟通(Geltzer&Gosh,2018)。我们在我们的书中进行了广泛讨论的平台社会:在关联的世界中的公共值“,社会的数字化和”平台化“涉及竞争思想系统和他们的竞争者之间的几种强烈斗争,促使重要问题:谁应该负责锚定在算法驱动并被数据推动的平台社会中的公共值?应该谈判什么样的公共值?欧洲公民和政府如何遵守某些社会和文化价值,同时依赖于平台生态系统,该平台基于商业价值观,并植根于新罗基世界的观点中? (c)2019 Jose Van Dijck。 elsevier有限公司出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号