首页> 外文期刊>Computer law & security report >Data retention in the UK: Pragmatic and proportionate, or a step too far?
【24h】

Data retention in the UK: Pragmatic and proportionate, or a step too far?

机译:英国的数据保留:实用和相称,还是太过分了?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

On 6 April 2009 new legislation came into force, for the first time putting Internet service providers' duty to retain significant amounts of data (relating to customers' email and Internet usage) on a compulsory, as opposed to a voluntary footing. It is a topic which has provoked intense protest from the privacy lobby and fuelled months of "Big Brother" headlines in the press. For the industry it raises operational challenges - how to facilitate storage and retrieval of colossal amounts of data. In this article we consider the policy background to the regime, the detail of the UK implementation and the practical implications for communications service providers. We weigh up the privacy and human rights concerns against the business case put forward by the Government. We also examine the Government's proposals - announced at the end of April - to significantly extend and "future proof this regime in the form of its Intercept Modernisation Programme.
机译:新法规于2009年4月6日生效,这是互联网服务提供商第一次有义务强制保留大量数据(与客户的电子邮件和互联网使用有关),而不是自愿立足。这个话题引起了隐私游说团体的强烈抗议,并在媒体上激起了数月的“老大哥”头条新闻。对于行业而言,这带来了运营挑战-如何促进庞大数据量的存储和检索。在本文中,我们将考虑该制度的政策背景,英国实施的细节以及对通信服务提供商的实际影响。我们根据政府提出的商业案例权衡隐私和人权问题。我们还研究了政府于4月底宣布的提议,以以“拦截现代化方案”的形式显着扩展和“证明该政权的未来”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号