...
首页> 外文期刊>The computer & internet lawyer >Obtaining and Protecting Personal Information in Litigation: The Perspective of a Wire and Electronic Communications Service Provider
【24h】

Obtaining and Protecting Personal Information in Litigation: The Perspective of a Wire and Electronic Communications Service Provider

机译:在诉讼中获取和保护个人信息:有线和电子通信服务提供商的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

You should take away from this discussion twin realizations regarding electronic communications and records in civil litigation discovery. The first is that obtaining such records may not be as simple as getting other forms of business documents from third-party witnesses. The second is that service providers and their counsel must be very careful in this area because potential liability is not trivial.rnProviders enjoy broad immunity ("no cause of action shall lie") under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(e) "for providing information, facilities or assistance in accordance with the terms of a court order, warrant, subpoena, statutory authorization, or certification under this chapter." In addition they are afforded "a complete defense" in a civil action pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2707(e) based onrna "good faith reliance on a court warrant or order, a grand jury subpoena, a legislative authorization, a statutory authorization."
机译:您应该从此讨论中摆脱关于民事诉讼发现中电子通信和记录的双重认识。首先,获取此类记录可能不像从第三方见证人那里获取其他形式的业务文档那样简单。第二点是,服务提供者及其律师在这方面必须非常小心,因为潜在的责任并非微不足道。根据《美国法典》第18条,服务提供者享有广泛的豁免权(“不得提出诉讼理由”)。 §2703(e)“用于根据法院命令,手令,传票,法定授权或本章规定的证明提供信息,便利或协助。”此外,根据18 U.S.C.,他们在民事诉讼中享有“全面辩护”的权利。 §2707(e)基于“诚实地依赖法院令或命令,大陪审团传票,立法授权,法定授权”。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The computer & internet lawyer》 |2009年第10期|18-25|共8页
  • 作者

    Drew C. Arena;

  • 作者单位

    Law Enforcement and National Security Compliance at Verizon, Inc.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号