首页> 外文期刊>The computer & internet lawyer >Copyright Infringement: An Analysis of the Application and Registration Approaches
【24h】

Copyright Infringement: An Analysis of the Application and Registration Approaches

机译:侵犯版权:申请和注册方法分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In light of the legislative history discussed in the La Resolana case, the most recent act of Congress implies a shift in the ultimate goal of the copyright statute. It is fairly clear that the plain language of Title 17, as it stood before the FECA amendments in 2005, did not seek to promote justice for copyright owners,but sought to avoid a "shifting of legal entitlements"74 that would occur if the copyright owner brought an action for infringement and the Copyright Office subsequently rejected his or her application. In times of rapid change in commerce, it would be inequitable as well as counter-productive to the promotion of rapid fair dealings administered by the courts to require that copyrightable material wait for the Copyright Office to approve or reject an application for copyright registration.
机译:鉴于在La Resolana案中讨论的立法历史,国会的最新法案暗示了版权法规最终目标的转变。显然,在2005年FECA修正案之前,标题17的通俗语言并没有寻求促进版权拥有者的正义,而是希望避免如果版权受到侵犯会发生“法律权利的转移” 74。所有者提起了侵权诉讼,版权局随后拒绝了他或她的申请。在商业瞬息万变的时代,促进法院管理的快速公平交易要求有版权保护的材料等待版权局批准或拒绝版权注册申请,这是不公平的,而且适得其反。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The computer & internet lawyer》 |2013年第4期|32-38|共7页
  • 作者

    Alexis Hatzis;

  • 作者单位

    Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center Computer Science from Barnard College of Columbia University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号