首页> 外文期刊>Computational Mechanics >Meshless Galerkin least-squares method
【24h】

Meshless Galerkin least-squares method

机译:无网格Galerkin最小二乘法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Collocation method and Galerkin method have been dominant in the existing meshless methods. Galerkin-based meshless methods are computational intensive, whereas collocation-based meshless methods suffer from instability. A new efficient meshless method, meshless Galerkin lest-squares method (MGLS), is proposed in this paper to combine the advantages of Galerkin method and collocation method. The problem domain is divided into two subdomains, the interior domain and boundary domain. Galerkin method is applied in the boundary domain, whereas the least-squares method is applied in the interior domain.The proposed scheme elliminates the posibilities of spurious solutions as that in the least-square method if an incorrect boundary conditions are used. To investigate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method, a cantilevered beam and an infinite plate with a central circular hole are analyzed in detail and numerical results are compared with those obtained by Galerkin-based meshless method (GBMM), collocation-based meshless method (CBMM) and meshless weighted least squares method (MWLS). Numerical studies show that the accuracy of the proposed MGLS is much higher than that of CBMM and is close to, even better than, that of GBMM, while the computational cost is much less than that of GBMM.
机译:在现有的无网格方法中,配置方法和Galerkin方法一直占主导地位。基于Galerkin的无网格方法需要大量的计算,而基于搭配的无网格方法则存在不稳定的问题。结合Galerkin方法和配置方法的优点,提出了一种新的有效的无网格方法,即无网格Galerkin最小二乘法(MGLS)。问题域分为两个子域,内部域和边界域。边界域采用Galerkin方法,内部域采用最小二乘法。如果使用了不正确的边界条件,则与最小二乘方法相比,拟议的方案消除了伪解的可能性。为了研究该方法的准确性和效率,详细分析了悬臂梁和带有中心圆孔的无限板,并将数值结果与基于Galerkin的无网格方法(GBMM),基于搭配的无网格方法获得的结果进行了比较。 (CBMM)和无网格加权最小二乘法(MWLS)。数值研究表明,所提出的MGLS的精度比CBMM的精度高得多,并且接近于甚至优于GBMM,而计算成本却比GBMM低得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号