首页> 外文期刊>Computational Geosciences >Direct numerical simulation of fully saturated flow in natural porous media at the pore scale: a comparison of three computational systems
【24h】

Direct numerical simulation of fully saturated flow in natural porous media at the pore scale: a comparison of three computational systems

机译:在孔尺度上天然多孔介质中完全饱和流动的直接数值模拟:三种计算系统的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Direct numerical simulations of flow through two millimeter-scale rock samples of limestone and sandstone are performed using three diverse fluid dynamic simulators. The resulting steady-state velocity fields are compared in terms of the associated empirical probability density functions (PDFs) and key statistics of the velocity fields. The pore space geometry of each sample is imaged at 5.06-mu m voxel size resolution using X-ray microtomography. The samples offer contrasting characteristics in terms of total connected porosity (about 0.31 for the limestone and 0.07 for the sandstone) and are typical of several applications in hydrogeology and petroleum engineering. The three-dimensional fluid velocity fields within the explicit pore spaces are simulated using ANSYSA (R) FLUENTA (R) ANSYS Inc. (2009), EULAG Prusa et al. (Comput. Fluids 37, 1193-1207 2008), and SSTOKES Sarkar et al. (2002). These computational approaches are highly disperse in terms of algorithmic complexity, differ in terms of their governing equations, the adopted numerical methodologies, the enforcement of internal no-slip boundary conditions at the fluid-solid interface, and the computational mesh structure. As metrics of comparison to probe in a statistical sense the internal similarities/differences across sample populations of velocities obtained through the computational systems, we consider (i) integral quantities, such as the Darcy flux and (ii) main statistical moments of local velocity distributions including local correlations between velocity fields. Comparison of simulation results indicates that mutually consistent estimates of the state of flow are obtained in the analyzed samples of natural pore spaces despite the considerable differences associated with the three computational approaches. We note that in the higher porosity limestone sample, the structures of the velocity fields obtained using ANSYS FLUENT and EULAG are more alike than either compared against the results obtained using SSTOKES. In the low-porosity sample, the structures of the velocity fields obtained by EULAG and SSTOKES are more similar than either is to the fields obtained using ANSYS FLUENT. With respect to macroscopic quantities, ANSYS FLUENT and SSTOKES provide similar results in terms of the average vertical velocity for both of the complex microscale geometries considered, while EULAG tends to render the largest velocity values. The influence of the pore space structure on fluid velocity field characteristics is also discussed.
机译:使用三个不同的流体动力学模拟器对流过两个毫米级石灰岩和砂岩样品的流量进行了直接数值模拟。根据相关的经验概率密度函数(PDF)和速度场的关键统计数据,比较所得的稳态速度场。使用X射线显微断层摄影术以5.06微米的体素尺寸分辨率对每个样品的孔空间几何形状进行成像。这些样品在总连通孔隙度方面(石灰岩约为0.31,砂岩约为0.07)具有鲜明的对比,是水文地质和石油工程中几种应用的典型代表。使用ANSYSA(R)FLUENTA(R)ANSYS Inc.(2009),EULAG Prusa等人模拟了显式孔隙空间内的三维流体速度场。 (Comput.Fluids 37,1193-1207 2008),和SSTOKES Sarkar等人。 (2002)。这些计算方法在算法复杂度方面高度分散,在控制方程式,采用的数值方法,在流体-固体界面处实施内部无滑移边界条件以及计算网格结构等方面有所不同。作为在统计意义上进行探测的比较度量,通过计算系统获得的速度样本种群之间的内部相似性/差异,我们考虑了(i)积分量,例如达西通量,以及(ii)局部速度分布的主要统计矩包括速度场之间的局部相关性。模拟结果的比较表明,尽管与三种计算方法相关的差异很大,但在分析的天然孔隙空间样本中却获得了相互一致的流动状态估计。我们注意到,在较高孔隙度的石灰岩样品中,与使用SSTOKES获得的结果相比,使用ANSYS FLUENT和EULAG获得的速度场的结构更加相似。在低孔隙度样品中,通过EULAG和SSTOKES获得的速度场结构与使用ANSYS FLUENT获得的速度场更相似。对于宏观量,ANSYS FLUENT和SSTOKES对于所考虑的两个复杂的微尺度几何形状,在平均垂直速度方面都提供了相似的结果,而EULAG倾向于呈现最大的速度值。还讨论了孔空间结构对流体速度场特性的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Computational Geosciences》 |2015年第2期|423-437|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Ingn Civile & Ambientale, I-20133 Milan, Italy;

    Los Alamos Natl Lab, Earth & Environm Sci Div, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA|Los Alamos Natl Lab, Div Theoret, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA|Univ Arizona, Program Appl Math, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA;

    Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Ingn Civile & Ambientale, I-20133 Milan, Italy|Univ Arizona, Dept Hydrol & Water Resources, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA;

    Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Ingn Civile & Ambientale, I-20133 Milan, Italy|Univ Arizona, Dept Hydrol & Water Resources, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA;

    Univ Arizona, Dept Hydrol & Water Resources, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA|Univ Arizona, Program Appl Math, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA;

    European Ctr Medium Range Weather Forecasts, Reading RG2 9AX, Berks, England;

    Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Geosci, F-34095 Montpellier, France;

    Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Geosci, F-34095 Montpellier, France;

    Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Energia, I-20133 Milan, Italy;

    Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Energia, I-20133 Milan, Italy;

    Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Energia, I-20133 Milan, Italy;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Pore-scale flow simulation; Porous media; Eulerian grid-based methods; Computational model comparison; Immersed boundary method;

    机译:孔隙水流模拟多孔介质欧拉网格法计算模型比较浸入边界法;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号