...
首页> 外文期刊>Computational economics >Computational aspects of prospect theory with asset pricing applications
【24h】

Computational aspects of prospect theory with asset pricing applications

机译:前景理论在资产定价应用中的计算方面

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We develop an algorithm to compute asset allocations for Kahneman and Tversky's (Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291, 1979) prospect theory. An application to benchmark data as in Fama and French (Journal of Financial Economics, 47(2),427-465,1992) shows that the equity premium puzzle is resolved for parameter values similar to those found in the laboratory experiments of Kahneman and Tversky (Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291, 1979). While previous studies like Benartzi and Thaler (The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1), 73-92, 1995), Barberis, Huang and Santos (The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 1-53, 2001), and Grime and Semmler (Asset prices and loss aversion, Germany, Mimeo Bielefeld University, 2005) focussed on dynamic aspects of asset pricing but only used loss aversion to explain the equity premium puzzle our paper explains the unconditional moments of asset pricing by a static two-period optimization problem. However, we incorporate asymmetric risk aversion. Our approach allows reducing the degree of loss aversion from 2.353 to 2.25, which is the value found by Tversky and Kahneman (Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5,297-323,1992) while increasing the risk aversion from 1 to 0.894, which is a slightly higher value than the 0.88 found by Tversky and Kahneman (Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323, 1992). The equivalence of these parameter settings is robust to incorporating the size and the value portfolios of Fama and French (Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465,1992). However, the optimal prospect theory portfolios found on this larger set of assets differ drastically from the optimal mean-variance portfolio.
机译:我们开发了一种算法来计算Kahneman和Tversky(Econometrica,47(2),263-291,1979)前景理论的资产分配。如Fama和French(Journal of Financial Economics,47(2),427-465,1992)中对基准数据的应用表明,股票溢价之谜的参数值与在Kahneman和Tversky的实验室实验中发现的参数值相似(Econometrica,47(2),263-291,1979)。尽管先前的研究如Benartzi和Thaler(《经济学季刊》,110(1),73-92,1995),Barberis,Huang和Santos(《经济学季刊》,116(1),1-53,2001), Grime和Semmler(资产价格和损失规避,德国,米米奥比勒费尔德大学,2005)专注于资产定价的动态方面,但仅使用损失规避来解释股权溢价之谜,我们的论文通过静态两个解释了资产定价的无条件时刻。周期优化问题。但是,我们引入了不对称风险规避。我们的方法允许将损失规避的程度从2.353降低到2.25,这是Tversky和Kahneman发现的值(风险与不确定性杂志,5,297-323,1992),同时将风险规避从1增大到0.894,这是一个略微的高于Tversky和Kahneman发现的0.88(风险与不确定性杂志,第5卷,第297-323页,1992年)。这些参数设置的等效性对于合并Fama和French的规模和价值组合具有鲁棒性(Journal of Finance,47(2),427-465,1992)。但是,在这套较大的资产集上发现的最优前景理论投资组合与最优均值方差投资组合截然不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号