...
首页> 外文期刊>Composites >Assessment of bonding stresses between FRP sheets and masonry pillars during delamination tests
【24h】

Assessment of bonding stresses between FRP sheets and masonry pillars during delamination tests

机译:在分层测试中评估FRP板和砌体柱之间的粘结应力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Under the simplifying assumption of perfect adhesion, motivated by the wide adoption of highly resistant glues, delamination of FRP-reinforced masonry pillars turns out to be governed exclusively by the nonlinear behavior of the quasi-brittle, heterogeneous support. However, at the structural level, the macroscopic delamination response can be described effectively by concentrating all the sources of dissipation and non-linearity at the masonry-FRP interface, and assuming the support to behave as a linear-elastic body. In this paper, a detailed and critical comparison between two different fully three-dimensional finite element models is developed: (i) a model in which only masonry (i.e. brick and mortar independently) is damageable whilst the FRP reinforcement adheres perfectly to the support (namely, exclusively bulk damage is accounted for), and an alternative model (ii) in which a cohesive, zero thickness interface between the FRP and the support is considered (i.e. interface damage), whilst masonry behaves as a heterogeneous linear elastic material. The overall response during delamination and local stress distributions at the interface are critically investigated, varying the FRP reinforcement width.
机译:在完美粘合的简化假设下,由于广泛采用了高抗性的胶水,FRP加固的砖石柱的分层最终仅受准脆性,异质支撑的非线性行为支配。但是,在结构层面上,可以通过将所有耗散和非线性源集中在砖石-FRP界面上,并假设支撑件表现为线性弹性体,从而有效地描述宏观分层反应。在本文中,开发了两种不同的全三维有限元模型之间的详细且严格的比较:(i)一种模型,其中仅砖石结构(即独立于砖和灰浆)是可损坏的,而FRP钢筋却完美地附着在支撑物上(即,仅考虑了整体损坏),以及另一种模型(ii),其中考虑了FRP和支撑之间的内聚性,零厚度界面(即界面损坏),而砌体则表现为异质线性弹性材料。严格研究了分层过程中的整体响应和界面处的局部应力分布,从而改变了FRP加固宽度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号