首页> 外文期刊>Communications of the ACM >Viewpoint Doctoral Program Rankings for U.S. Computing Programs: The National Research Council Strikes Out
【24h】

Viewpoint Doctoral Program Rankings for U.S. Computing Programs: The National Research Council Strikes Out

机译:美国计算机专业的观点博士专业排名:美国国家研究委员会(National Research Council)出台

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

So how should the process work? Here are our suggestions: 1. Work with the relevant societies in order to generate metrics that matter to their constituents. 2. Realize that reputation does matter and include it in the metrics. There is an interesting feedback loop between rankings and reputation, of course. But this also means reputation has some validity as a measure of rank, so incorporate it. 3. Explore making the rankings subdiscipline-dependent. It is clear that different departments have different strengths. Thus, enabling a finer-grained assessment would allow a department with strength in a sub-field, but perhaps not the same across-the-board strength, to gain appropriate visibility. This may be particularly valuable for students deciding where to apply.
机译:那么该过程应该如何工作?以下是我们的建议:1.与相关协会合作,以制定对其选民重要的指标。 2.意识到声誉确实很重要,并将其包含在指标中。当然,排名和声誉之间会有一个有趣的反馈循环。但这也意味着声誉可以作为等级评定的有效手段,因此应将其合并。 3.探索使排名与子学科相关。显然,不同部门具有不同的优势。因此,启用更细粒度的评估将使具有子领域实力的部门,但也许不是同一部门的整体实力,能够获得适当的可见性。对于决定申请地点的学生而言,这可能特别有价值。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Communications of the ACM》 |2011年第12期|p.41-43|共3页
  • 作者

    Andrew Bernat; Eric Grimson;

  • 作者单位

    Computing Research Association in Washington, D.C;

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, MA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号