...
首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Communications Magazine >Revisiting the issue of the credibility of simulation studies in telecommunication networks: highlighting the results of a comprehensive survey of IEEE publications
【24h】

Revisiting the issue of the credibility of simulation studies in telecommunication networks: highlighting the results of a comprehensive survey of IEEE publications

机译:重新审视电信网络中仿真研究的可信度问题:强调对IEEE出版物进行全面调查的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In a series of papers by Pawlikowski and his team, they warned about a deep crisis of credibility in simulation studies for the performance evaluation of telecommunication networks. The goal of this article is to revisit the investigation on simulation credibility and to extend the previous research in this area by presenting the results of a comprehensive survey of over 8370 IEEE publications (2007??2009) on telecommunication networks which appeared in the proceedings of IEEE Transactions on Communications (TC), IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TN), IEEE Infocom, IEEE ICC, and IEEE Globecom. These proceedings were selected based on their popularity and relevance to our study. Besides simulation credibility, we also report on the commonly used simulation tools and performance analysis methodology adopted by the authors of the surveyed papers. Our findings show that a significant number of authors did not provide information of the simulation tools used or, even when they did, there was not enough information about the CI or SE of simulation results presented in the surveyed papers. Thus, there is no significant change with respect to quality and credibility of the simulation studies revised and the deep crisis of credibility still remains. The research design most authors prefer is a hybrid one where both simulation and analytic methods are being used for network performance analysis. Finally, we provide guidelines for the best practice of using simulation tools for the performance evaluation of telecommunication networks.
机译:在Pawlikowski及其团队的一系列论文中,他们警告说在电信网络性能评估的仿真研究中存在严重的信誉危机。本文的目的是通过介绍对8370篇IEEE电信网络出版物(2007 ?? 2009)的全面调查结果来重新审视对模拟可信度的研究,并扩展该领域的先前研究,该出版物出现在2000年的IEEE会议论文集中。 IEEE通信事务(TC),IEEE / ACM网络事务(TN),IEEE Infocom,IEEE ICC和IEEE Globecom。这些程序是根据其受欢迎程度和与我们研究的相关性选择的。除了仿真的可信度,我们还报告了被调查论文的作者采用的常用仿真工具和性能分析方法。我们的发现表明,很多作者没有提供所使用的仿真工具的信息,或者即使提供了信息,也没有足够的关于被调查论文中给出的仿真结果的CI或SE的信息。因此,修订后的模拟研究在质量和可信度方面没有显着变化,并且仍然存在严重的可信度危机。大多数作者更喜欢的研究设计是一种混合设计,其中仿真和分析方法都用于网络性能分析。最后,我们提供了使用仿真工具进行电信网络性能评估的最佳实践指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号